You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2014/01/06 15:45:48 UTC
Jena 2.11.1?
I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
simple release? I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
preparation, that would be great.
Andy
Re: Jena 2.11.1?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 06/01/14 17:49, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Hi Andy!
>
> Does this imply also releasing a new version of Fuseki, presumably 1.0.1?
>
> If yes, I'd be happy to try it out - I've been waiting for my jena-text
> graph awareness patches to appear in an official release of Fuseki.
Yes.
The current snapshots include your contributions.
The website in staging http://jena.staging.apache.org/ should have the
text changes as well.
Andy
>
> -Osma
>
> 06.01.2014 16:45, Andy Seaborne kirjoitti:
>> I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
>> up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
>>
>> Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
>> simple release? I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
>>
>> Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
>> from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
>> because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
>>
>> To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
>> preparation, that would be great.
>>
>> Andy
>
>
Re: Jena 2.11.1?
Posted by Osma Suominen <os...@helsinki.fi>.
Hi Andy!
Does this imply also releasing a new version of Fuseki, presumably 1.0.1?
If yes, I'd be happy to try it out - I've been waiting for my jena-text
graph awareness patches to appear in an official release of Fuseki.
-Osma
06.01.2014 16:45, Andy Seaborne kirjoitti:
> I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
> up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
>
> Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
> simple release? I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
>
> Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
> from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
> because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
>
> To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
> preparation, that would be great.
>
> Andy
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
osma.suominen@helsinki.fi
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
Re: Jena 2.11.1?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 09/01/14 14:37, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Ok, are you OK at leaving JENA-615 where it is currently I.e available in
> the standard optimiser but off by default?
Yes - no problem.
I'm happy either for as-is or in the codebase but not mentioned in the
default optimizer for now.
Andy
>
> I haven't had chance to look into this much further and profiling didn't
> shed light on anything particularly useful.
>
> Rob
>
> On 09/01/2014 13:38, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/14 14:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
>>> up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
>>>
>>> Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
>>> simple release?
>>
>> Ping.
>>
>>> I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
>>>
>>> Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
>>> from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
>>> because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
>>
>> Rob - thanks for sorting that.
>>
>>> To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
>>> preparation, that would be great.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>
>> Are there any library changes anywhere (I don't think there are but I'm
>> checking here).
>>
>> Otherwise, I will try to do the build and start the VOTE tomorrow.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Jena 2.11.1?
Posted by Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org>.
Ok, are you OK at leaving JENA-615 where it is currently I.e available in
the standard optimiser but off by default?
I haven't had chance to look into this much further and profiling didn't
shed light on anything particularly useful.
Rob
On 09/01/2014 13:38, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>On 06/01/14 14:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
>> up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
>>
>> Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
>> simple release?
>
>Ping.
>
>> I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
>>
>> Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
>> from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
>> because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
>
>Rob - thanks for sorting that.
>
>> To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
>> preparation, that would be great.
>>
>> Andy
>
>Are there any library changes anywhere (I don't think there are but I'm
>checking here).
>
>Otherwise, I will try to do the build and start the VOTE tomorrow.
>
> Andy
>
Re: Jena 2.11.1?
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 06/01/14 14:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> I think a 2.11.1 release as a maintenance release would be good to pick
> up the various fixes/tweaks/etc that have gone in since 2.11.0.
>
> Does anyone want to try out the release process on what should (!!) be a
> simple release?
Ping.
> I'm happy to do it if no one steps in.
>
> Rob - I would have to make the mem-driver tests ignore the two tests
> from the test framework that don't work reliably for me with java7
> because the queries runs too fast (!) http://s.apache.org/wV
Rob - thanks for sorting that.
> To all dev@ readers - if you could try out the current snapshot build in
> preparation, that would be great.
>
> Andy
Are there any library changes anywhere (I don't think there are but I'm
checking here).
Otherwise, I will try to do the build and start the VOTE tomorrow.
Andy