You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by lb <lb...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/21 12:46:48 UTC
Cellar discovery service
Hi all,
I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great
however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so far
there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and some
other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ?
Best regards,
Luca
Re: Cellar discovery service
Posted by lb <lb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Achim,
well, I think there's almost nothing to do in Cellar except eventually drop
custom discovery-service and delegate it to hazelcast's built in ones as it
is only a matter of Hazelcast configuration.
But I'll open a Jira :-)
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> well, create a Jira for it, so it's not going to be forgotten ;)
> Afaik we didn't have it on the road-map till now,
> and maybe you're able to provide a pull-request for it :)
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2015-12-21 12:46 GMT+01:00 lb <lb...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great
> > however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so
> far
> > there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and
> some
> > other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Luca
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
Re: Cellar discovery service
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Luca,
well, create a Jira for it, so it's not going to be forgotten ;)
Afaik we didn't have it on the road-map till now,
and maybe you're able to provide a pull-request for it :)
regards, Achim
2015-12-21 12:46 GMT+01:00 lb <lb...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great
> however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so far
> there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and some
> other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ?
>
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: Cellar discovery service
Posted by lb <lb...@gmail.com>.
That makes sense.
Thank you JB
On Monday, 21 December 2015, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> see my comment in the Jira.
>
> Even if Hazelcast Discover SPI is interesting, I would avoid to replace
> the Cellar Discovery service by Hazelcast one: even if Cellar uses
> Hazelcast, it's not tight to Hazelcast, and so, it could be used by
> different backends (zookeeper, yarn, mesos, whatever ...).
>
> So using hazelcast discovery SPI will tight too much Cellar with
> Hazelcast. However, support Hazelcast Discovery SPI as a backend of Cellar
> Discovery can make sense.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/21/2015 12:46 PM, lb wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great
>> however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so far
>> there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and some
>> other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Luca
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Cellar discovery service
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Luca,
see my comment in the Jira.
Even if Hazelcast Discover SPI is interesting, I would avoid to replace
the Cellar Discovery service by Hazelcast one: even if Cellar uses
Hazelcast, it's not tight to Hazelcast, and so, it could be used by
different backends (zookeeper, yarn, mesos, whatever ...).
So using hazelcast discovery SPI will tight too much Cellar with
Hazelcast. However, support Hazelcast Discovery SPI as a backend of
Cellar Discovery can make sense.
Regards
JB
On 12/21/2015 12:46 PM, lb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a very quick look at cellar discovery service and it looks great
> however in Hazelcast 3.6 a new discovery SPI will be introduced and so far
> there are a few implementation like etcd, dns, consul, kubernetes and some
> other under development: would karaf-cellar adopt them in the future ?
>
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com