You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/20 14:51:30 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (DERBY-5539) Harden password hashing in the builtin authentication service

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-5539:
--------------------------------------

    Attachment: d5539-1a.diff

Attaching patch d5539-1a.diff, which adds the two proposed properties (with the defaults suggested in the issue description) and makes the configurable hash scheme in AuthenticationServiceBase use them.

When using the existing algorithm, we store the credentials as a token with the following components:

  - a format identifier
  - the hashed password
  - the name of the hash function

With the new algorithm, the format identifier is bumped, and the random salt and the number of iterations are added to the token.

If the data dictionary version is less than 10.9, the two properties are ignored. This is done to ensure that it is safe to set passwords in soft upgrade mode. The patch also adds upgrade tests to verify this (more precisely, it moved the upgrade tests for DERBY-4483 from Changes10_6 to Changes10_9, so that they'll also test upgrade from 10.6, 10.7 and 10.8, and updated them to check the stored tokens against the new format). AuthenticationTest was also updated to test the new format.

The regression tests ran cleanly. Patch is ready for review.
                
> Harden password hashing in the builtin authentication service
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5539
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5539
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>         Attachments: d5539-1a.diff
>
>
> The Open Web Application Security Project has some suggestions on how to make it harder for an attacker to crack hashed passwords: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Hashing_Java
> The builtin authentication service doesn't follow all the suggestions. In particular, it doesn't add a random salt, and it only performs the hash operation once.
> I propose that we add two new properties that makes it possible to configure builtin to use a random salt and run multiple iterations of the hash operation:
> - derby.authentication.builtin.saltLength - the length of the random salt to add (in bytes)
> - derby.authentication.builtin.iterations - the number of times to perform the hash operation
> I'd also suggest that we set the defaults so that random salt and multiple iterations are used by default. The OWASP page mentions 64 bits of salt (8 bytes) and a minimum of 1000 iterations. I consulted a security expert who thought that these recommendations sounded OK, but he believed the recommended salt length was likely to be revised and suggested 16 bytes instead. The only price we pay by going from 8 to 16 bytes, is that we'll need to store 8 bytes extra per user in the database, so I don't see any reason not to set the default for derby.authentication.builtin.saltLength as high as 16. Setting the default for derby.authentication.builtin.iterations to 1000 will make authentication of a user somewhat slower (which is the point, really), but experiments on my machine suggest that running our default hash function (SHA-256) 1000 times takes around 1 ms. Since authentication only happens when establishing a new connection to the database, that would be a negligible cost, I think.
> If saltLength is set to 0 and iterations is set to 1, the hashing will be done in the exact same way as in previous versions.
> Both of the properties should only be respected when the data dictionary version is 10.9 or higher, so that users in soft-upgraded databases can still log in after a downgrade.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira