[jira] [Updated] (ISIS-2235) Mixins declared using @Property, @Collection or @Action shouldn't need to indicate contribution style.

["Daniel Keir Haywood (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel Keir Haywood updated ISIS-2235:
--------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.0.0-M3)
                   2.0.0

> Mixins declared using @Property, @Collection or @Action shouldn't need to indicate contribution style.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-2235
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2235
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Daniel Keir Haywood
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> for example, with this mixin:
> {code:java}
> @Property
> public class SimpleObject_self {
>     private final SimpleObject simpleObject;
>     public SimpleObject_self(SimpleObject simpleObject) {
>         this.simpleObject = simpleObject;
>     }
>     @ActionLayout(contributed = Contributed.AS_ASSOCIATION)
>     public SimpleObject prop() {
>         return simpleObject;
>     }
> }
>  {code}
> it's necessary to specify @ActionLayout, otherwise the behaviour is contributed as both an association and an action.
> The @ActionLayout should be inferred.
> ~~~
> See the same for @Collection and @Action also ... should imply AS_ASSOCIATION and AS_ACTION respectively.
> ~~~
> Also, (and this might be a slightly different issue), the facets defined by @Property(...) should be copied down correctly to the corresponding facets on the action, eg domain event (this might need specifying more precisely...)
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)