You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@karaf.apache.org by "Koprowski, Mariusz" <Ma...@Hexagonmining.com> on 2017/04/19 16:58:17 UTC
Hiding standard features
Hi All is ther any way to group or hide standard features ?
E.g. I have a activemq features and I would like to group them all in to MyActiveMQ feature... how this can be done ? And can it be done ?
Should I create new feature that will be a copy of ActiveMQ features with hidden set to true and MyActiveMQ that will combine that features ??
Best regards
--
Mariusz Koprowski
Re: Hiding standard features
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
tweaking the ACL you can limit the actions on some subset of features.
Regards
JB
On 04/19/2017 06:58 PM, Koprowski, Mariusz wrote:
> Hi All is ther any way to group or hide standard features ?
> E.g. I have a activemq features and I would like to group them all in to
> MyActiveMQ feature... how this can be done ? And can it be done ?
>
> Should I create new feature that will be a copy of ActiveMQ features with hidden
> set to true and MyActiveMQ that will combine that features ??
>
> Best regards
> --
> Mariusz Koprowski
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Hiding standard features
Posted by Steinar Bang <sb...@dod.no>.
>>>>> "Koprowski, Mariusz" <Ma...@Hexagonmining.com>:
> Hi All is ther any way to group or hide standard features ?
Why do you need to hide it?
If you don't install it or require it, it's never loaded.
> E.g. I have a activemq features and I would like to group them all in
> to MyActiveMQ feature... how this can be done ? And can it be done ?
> Should I create new feature that will be a copy of ActiveMQ features
> with hidden set to true and MyActiveMQ that will combine that features
> ??
That's what I would have done. I would also have given the features
different names than the existing features.
It might be that loading a feature repository with new version of
existing features would "overrule" the built-in features (I haven't
tried), but why court a possible conflict...?