You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@streams.apache.org by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> on 2016/09/19 15:07:01 UTC
[RESTART][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences
compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retirement guide link below).
The most notable difference is that the podling website, in this case
http://streams.apache.org, will be taken down as well.
To make sure everyone has taken note, I'm hereby restarting the vote:
As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
The process is described at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
[ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
[ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
[ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
Ate
On 2016-09-18 23:27, Ate Douma wrote:
> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>
> The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
>
> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
> [ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
>
> Ate
>
[CANCELLED][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and
Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move
forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement.
I'm looking forward to the next steps!
Kind regards, Ate
On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote:
> As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
> retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences
> compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below).
>
> The most notable difference is that the podling website, in this case
> http://streams.apache.org, will be taken down as well.
>
> To make sure everyone has taken note, I'm hereby restarting the vote:
>
> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>
> The process is described at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>
> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
> [ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
>
> Ate
>
>
> On 2016-09-18 23:27, Ate Douma wrote:
>> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
>> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>>
>> The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
>>
>> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
>> [ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
>> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
>>
>> Ate
>>
>
>
[CANCELLED][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and
Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move
forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement.
I'm looking forward to the next steps!
Kind regards, Ate
On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote:
> As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for
> retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences
> compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below).
>
> The most notable difference is that the podling website, in this case
> http://streams.apache.org, will be taken down as well.
>
> To make sure everyone has taken note, I'm hereby restarting the vote:
>
> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>
> The process is described at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
>
> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
> [ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
>
> Ate
>
>
> On 2016-09-18 23:27, Ate Douma wrote:
>> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on
>> retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic.
>>
>> The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html
>>
>> [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic
>> [ ] ±0 Proceed according to the majority
>> [ ] -1 Do not move Streams to the Attic, because... [please add justification]
>>
>> Ate
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org