You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/03/19 19:56:33 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7252] -
Should fopen() in this example really be ap_pfopen ()?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7252>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7252
Should fopen() in this example really be ap_pfopen ()?
jerenkrantz@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From jerenkrantz@apache.org 2002-03-19 18:56 -------
Yeah, it should be. That fragment is sorely out-of-date.
Revision 1.20 of httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/misc/API.html has a
quick pass at trying to make it reflect 1.3's reality. The website
now has the latest version.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org