You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com> on 2014/03/21 19:47:00 UTC

GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Hi,

I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from scratch on a minimal setup.

I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3

Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering using the GUI fix up from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162

I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
None in the GUI:
http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX

And none in the database:
http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw

So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical networks.

If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.

Any thoughts ?

Best Regards,
Florin


IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com>.

At what stage is the DB upgrade performed ? Is it handled by the new version of CS on first time start, or does the admin have to run something manually ?
I have followed the upgrade instructions here and there was nothing mentioned about a database upgrade step (please note I am using XenServer):
http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3

I did not invoke "cloudstack-setup-database" script as my understanding is that should be called on a clean install only.

Thank you,
Florin



________________________________________
From: Jessica Wang [Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical
network.

On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:

>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network -
>>for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>
>Murali, please confirm.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create
>>the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>enable it in the GUI.
>
>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our CS
>UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>
>
>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the
>>existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>
>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable it
>on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical network,
>on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and add all the
>providers associated with this option, to the physical network. So it
>would be a UI issue.
>
>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>
>
>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>
>>
>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the
>>difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>
>>Kind Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>Prokharchyk
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Florin,
>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>>service provider.
>>The reasons might be:
>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in
>>Advanced zone)
>>
>>
>>Murali,
>>Is there other possibility?
>>
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Florin,
>>
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>
>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
>>then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>updateNetworkServiceProvider
>>. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
>>can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
>>and under what conditions?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alena.
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>from
>>>scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>
>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>>>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.
>>>h
>>>t
>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>
>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>>>using the GUI fix up from
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>
>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>>>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>None in the GUI:
>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>
>>>And none in the database:
>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>
>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>networks.
>>>
>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as
>>>it
>>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>


IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com>.

Hi,

I have taken the following steps from Cloudmonkey, as a workaround:

# List physical networks to get the id of the GRE isolated network:
cloudmonkey> list physicalnetworks

# Add "Ovs" network service provider to the GRE isolated network:
cloudmonkey> add networkserviceprovider name="Ovs" destinationphysicalnetworkid=<the_network_id_discovered_in_previos_step>
(there will be an id associated with the provider, suppose this is " b2f02334-e4c6-45b8-87c3-e96a7301b5ca")

# Enable the provider:
cloudmonkey> update networkserviceprovider id=b2f02334-e4c6-45b8-87c3-e96a7301b5ca state=Enabled

I will add this in the bug comments as well.

Regards,
Florin

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 5:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org)
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Oh, yea, I've mistaken it for some other bug - when new hypervisor wasn't inserted to the global config variable.

Florin, can you please provide the db upgrade statements you've executed to fix the problem, for the reference? In case other people are blocked by the same bug.

Thanks!
Alena.

On 4/2/14, 2:48 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi Alena,
>
>I think you have mistaken this with something else :)
>
>The bug I have raised below (CLOUDSTACK-6320) is for OVS.
>OVS network provider was introduced in 4.3.0 and when upgrading from
>older versions it should be inserted in the existing physical networks.
>To make it work I had to manually create the provider and enable it
>from Cloudmonkey interface. But this should be part of the DB upgrade somehow.
>
>Florin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:46 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org)
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Florin, you must have fixed it already on your side, but for other
>people
>information: to fix the problem, update cloud.configuration table by
>modifying the value for "hypervisor.list" parameter
>
>On 4/1/14, 9:42 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Raised a bug for the DB upgrade:
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320
>>
>>Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>+1
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
>>To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
>>network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to
>>physical network.
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>>>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>>>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the
>>>>network
>>>>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>>
>>>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>>>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>>>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>>>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>>>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical
>>>network.
>>>
>>>Murali, please confirm.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you
>>>>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can
>>>>confirm ...).
>>>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>>>enable it in the GUI.
>>>
>>>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the
>>>physical network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via
>>>API. Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network -
>>>for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have
>>>>preserved the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with
>>>>the OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>>>
>>>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you
>>>enable it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the
>>>physical network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the
>>>background call and add all the providers associated with this
>>>option, to the physical network. So it would be a UI issue.
>>>
>>>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>>>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3.
>>>And this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during
>>>the upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>>>
>>>
>>>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about
>>>>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>>>
>>>>Kind Regards,
>>>>Florin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
>>>>Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>>- Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>>
>>>>Florin,
>>>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have
>>>>OVS service provider.
>>>>The reasons might be:
>>>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only
>>>>supported in Advanced zone)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Murali,
>>>>Is there other possibility?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jessica
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jessica Wang
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>>- Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>>
>>>>Florin,
>>>>
>>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>>
>>>>Jessica
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>>
>>>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first,
>>>>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>>>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this
>>>>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports
>>>>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Alena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8
>>>>>installed from scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS
>>>>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rn
>>>>>o
>>>>>tes
>>>>>.
>>>>>h
>>>>>t
>>>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>>>
>>>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network
>>>>>offering using the GUI fix up from
>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>>>
>>>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical
>>>>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>>>None in the GUI:
>>>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>>>
>>>>>And none in the database:
>>>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>>>
>>>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone
>>>>>from scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the
>>>>>physical networks.
>>>>>
>>>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>>>
>>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Best Regards,
>>>>>Florin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any
>>>>>attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or
>>>>>used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the
>>>>>intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or
>>>>>completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a
>>>>>public network. If you suspect that the message may have been
>>>>>intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>>please call the sender.
>>>
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>please call the sender.
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We
>cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of
>this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you
>suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.

Oh, yea, I’ve mistaken it for some other bug - when new hypervisor wasn’t
inserted to the global config variable.

Florin, can you please provide the db upgrade statements you’ve executed
to fix the problem, for the reference? In case other people are blocked by
the same bug.

Thanks!
Alena.

On 4/2/14, 2:48 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi Alena,
>
>I think you have mistaken this with something else :)
>
>The bug I have raised below (CLOUDSTACK-6320) is for OVS.
>OVS network provider was introduced in 4.3.0 and when upgrading from
>older versions it should be inserted in the existing physical networks.
>To make it work I had to manually create the provider and enable it from
>Cloudmonkey interface. But this should be part of the DB upgrade somehow.
>
>Florin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:46 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org)
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Florin, you must have fixed it already on your side, but for other people
>information: to fix the problem, update cloud.configuration table by
>modifying the value for "hypervisor.list" parameter
>
>On 4/1/14, 9:42 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Raised a bug for the DB upgrade:
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320
>>
>>Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>+1
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
>>To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
>>network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to
>>physical network.
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>>>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>>>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the
>>>>network
>>>>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>>
>>>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>>>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>>>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>>>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>>>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical
>>>network.
>>>
>>>Murali, please confirm.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you
>>>>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can
>>>>confirm ...).
>>>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>>>enable it in the GUI.
>>>
>>>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>>>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our
>>>CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>>>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved
>>>>the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with
>>>>the OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>>>
>>>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable
>>>it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical
>>>network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and
>>>add all the providers associated with this option, to the physical
>>>network. So it would be a UI issue.
>>>
>>>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>>>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>>>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>>>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>>>
>>>
>>>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about
>>>>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>>>
>>>>Kind Regards,
>>>>Florin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>>>Prokharchyk
>>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>>
>>>>Florin,
>>>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have
>>>>OVS service provider.
>>>>The reasons might be:
>>>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported
>>>>in Advanced zone)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Murali,
>>>>Is there other possibility?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jessica
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jessica Wang
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>>
>>>>Florin,
>>>>
>>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>>
>>>>Jessica
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>>
>>>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first,
>>>>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>>>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this
>>>>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports
>>>>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Alena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>>>from scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS
>>>>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rno
>>>>>tes
>>>>>.
>>>>>h
>>>>>t
>>>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>>>
>>>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network
>>>>>offering using the GUI fix up from
>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>>>
>>>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical
>>>>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>>>None in the GUI:
>>>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>>>
>>>>>And none in the database:
>>>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>>>
>>>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>>>networks.
>>>>>
>>>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>>>
>>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Best Regards,
>>>>>Florin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>>>please call the sender.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>>please call the sender.
>>>
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We
>>cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of
>>this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you
>>suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please
>>call the sender.
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com>.

Hi Alena,

I think you have mistaken this with something else :)

The bug I have raised below (CLOUDSTACK-6320) is for OVS.
OVS network provider was introduced in 4.3.0 and when upgrading from older versions it should be inserted in the existing physical networks.
To make it work I had to manually create the provider and enable it from Cloudmonkey interface. But this should be part of the DB upgrade somehow.

Florin

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org)
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Florin, you must have fixed it already on your side, but for other people
information: to fix the problem, update cloud.configuration table by modifying the value for "hypervisor.list" parameter

On 4/1/14, 9:42 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Raised a bug for the DB upgrade:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320
>
>Regards,
>Florin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>+1
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
>To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
>network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to
>physical network.
>
>On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the
>>>network
>>>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>
>>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>
>>Murali, please confirm.
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you
>>>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can
>>>confirm ...).
>>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>>enable it in the GUI.
>>
>>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our
>>CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>
>>
>>
>>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved
>>>the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with
>>>the OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>>
>>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable
>>it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical
>>network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and
>>add all the providers associated with this option, to the physical
>>network. So it would be a UI issue.
>>
>>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>>
>>
>>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>>
>>>
>>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about
>>>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>>
>>>Kind Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>>Prokharchyk
>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>
>>>Florin,
>>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have
>>>OVS service provider.
>>>The reasons might be:
>>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported
>>>in Advanced zone)
>>>
>>>
>>>Murali,
>>>Is there other possibility?
>>>
>>>
>>>Jessica
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jessica Wang
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>
>>>Florin,
>>>
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>
>>>Jessica
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>
>>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first,
>>>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this
>>>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports
>>>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Alena.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>>from scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>>
>>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS
>>>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rno
>>>>tes
>>>>.
>>>>h
>>>>t
>>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>>
>>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network
>>>>offering using the GUI fix up from
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>>
>>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical
>>>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>>None in the GUI:
>>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>>
>>>>And none in the database:
>>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>>
>>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>>networks.
>>>>
>>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>>
>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>Best Regards,
>>>>Florin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>>please call the sender.
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>please call the sender.
>>
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We
>cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of
>this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you
>suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.

Florin, you must have fixed it already on your side, but for other people
information: to fix the problem, update cloud.configuration table by
modifying the value for “hypervisor.list” parameter

On 4/1/14, 9:42 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Raised a bug for the DB upgrade:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320
>
>Regards,
>Florin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>+1
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
>To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
>network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to
>physical network.
>
>On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network
>>>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>
>>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>>
>>Murali, please confirm.
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you
>>>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm
>>>...).
>>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>>enable it in the GUI.
>>
>>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our
>>CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>>
>>
>>
>>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved
>>>the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>>>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>>
>>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable
>>it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical
>>network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and
>>add all the providers associated with this option, to the physical
>>network. So it would be a UI issue.
>>
>>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>>
>>
>>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>>
>>>
>>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about
>>>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>>
>>>Kind Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>>Prokharchyk
>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>>
>>>Florin,
>>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>>>service provider.
>>>The reasons might be:
>>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported
>>>in Advanced zone)
>>>
>>>
>>>Murali,
>>>Is there other possibility?
>>>
>>>
>>>Jessica
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jessica Wang
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>
>>>Florin,
>>>
>>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>>
>>>Jessica
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>>
>>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first,
>>>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this
>>>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports
>>>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Alena.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>>from scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>>
>>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS
>>>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes
>>>>.
>>>>h
>>>>t
>>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>>
>>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network
>>>>offering using the GUI fix up from
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>>
>>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical
>>>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>>None in the GUI:
>>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>>
>>>>And none in the database:
>>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>>
>>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>>networks.
>>>>
>>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>>
>>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>Best Regards,
>>>>Florin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>>please call the sender.
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>please call the sender.
>>
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com>.

Raised a bug for the DB upgrade:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320

Regards,
Florin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:19 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical network.

On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:

>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network
>>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>
>Murali, please confirm.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you
>>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>enable it in the GUI.
>
>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our
>CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>
>
>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved
>>the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>
>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable
>it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical
>network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and
>add all the providers associated with this option, to the physical
>network. So it would be a UI issue.
>
>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>
>
>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>
>>
>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about
>>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>
>>Kind Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>Prokharchyk
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Florin,
>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>>service provider.
>>The reasons might be:
>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported
>>in Advanced zone)
>>
>>
>>Murali,
>>Is there other possibility?
>>
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) -
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Florin,
>>
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>
>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first,
>>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this
>>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports
>>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alena.
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>from scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>
>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS
>>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.
>>>h
>>>t
>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>
>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network
>>>offering using the GUI fix up from
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>
>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical
>>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>None in the GUI:
>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>
>>>And none in the database:
>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>
>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>networks.
>>>
>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended,
>>>please call the sender.
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments)
>>is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone
>>other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700.
>>We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness
>>of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If
>>you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>


IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.

+1


-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical
network.

On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:

>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network -
>>for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>
>Murali, please confirm.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create
>>the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>enable it in the GUI.
>
>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our CS
>UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>
>
>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the
>>existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>
>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable it
>on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical network,
>on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and add all the
>providers associated with this option, to the physical network. So it
>would be a UI issue.
>
>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>
>
>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>
>>
>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the
>>difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>
>>Kind Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>Prokharchyk
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Florin,
>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>>service provider.
>>The reasons might be:
>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in
>>Advanced zone)
>>
>>
>>Murali,
>>Is there other possibility?
>>
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Florin,
>>
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>
>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
>>then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>updateNetworkServiceProvider
>>. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
>>can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
>>and under what conditions?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alena.
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>from
>>>scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>
>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>>>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.
>>>h
>>>t
>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>
>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>>>using the GUI fix up from
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>
>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>>>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>None in the GUI:
>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>
>>>And none in the database:
>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>
>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>networks.
>>>
>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as
>>>it
>>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.

Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the
network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical
network.

On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:

>> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
>> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by
>>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
>> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network -
>>for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
>UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
>When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will
>automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3,
>server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
>
>Murali, please confirm.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create
>>the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>>enable it in the GUI.
>
>Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
>network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our CS
>UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
>calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
>
>
>
>>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the
>>existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
>
>So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable it
>on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical network,
>on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and add all the
>providers associated with this option, to the physical network. So it
>would be a UI issue.
>
>Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
>network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
>this provider wasn’t added to existing physical networks during the
>upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
>
>
>Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
>
>>
>>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the
>>difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>>
>>Kind Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>>Prokharchyk
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>>
>>Florin,
>>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>>service provider.
>>The reasons might be:
>>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in
>>Advanced zone)
>>
>>
>>Murali,
>>Is there other possibility?
>>
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jessica Wang
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Florin,
>>
>>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>>
>>Jessica
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>>
>>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
>>then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>>updateNetworkServiceProvider
>>. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
>>can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
>>and under what conditions?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alena.
>>
>>
>>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
>><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed
>>>from
>>>scratch on a minimal setup.
>>>
>>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>>>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.
>>>h
>>>t
>>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>>
>>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>>>using the GUI fix up from
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>>
>>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>>>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>>None in the GUI:
>>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>>
>>>And none in the database:
>>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>>
>>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>>networks.
>>>
>>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Florin
>>>
>>>
>>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as
>>>it
>>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.

> [Alena] Not exactly like that. 
> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. 
> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call. 

Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3, server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.

Murali, please confirm.



-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)



On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create
>the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>enable it in the GUI.

Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our CS
UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.



>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the
>existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).

So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable it
on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical network,
on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and add all the
providers associated with this option, to the physical network. So it
would be a UI issue.

Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the
upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.


Please confirm which one from the above is correct.

>
>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the
>difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>
>Kind Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>Prokharchyk
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Florin,
>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>service provider.
>The reasons might be:
>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in
>Advanced zone)
>
>
>Murali,
>Is there other possibility?
>
>
>Jessica
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>
>Florin,
>
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>
>Jessica
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>
>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
>then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>updateNetworkServiceProvider
>. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
>can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
>and under what conditions?
>
>Thanks,
>Alena.
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>>scratch on a minimal setup.
>>
>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.h
>>t
>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>
>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>>using the GUI fix up from
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>
>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>None in the GUI:
>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>
>>And none in the database:
>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>
>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>networks.
>>
>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>
>>Any thoughts ?
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.


On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create
>the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and
>enable it in the GUI.

Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical
network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our CS
UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by
calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.



>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the
>existing configuration with the existing physical network.
>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the
>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).

So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable it
on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical network,
on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and add all the
providers associated with this option, to the physical network. So it
would be a UI issue.

Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your
network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And
this provider wasn’t added to existing physical networks during the
upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.


Please confirm which one from the above is correct.

>
>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using
>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the
>difference between "oss" and "noredist".
>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
>
>Kind Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena
>Prokharchyk
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
>
>Florin,
>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS
>service provider.
>The reasons might be:
>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in
>Advanced zone)
>
>
>Murali,
>Is there other possibility?
>
>
>Jessica
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jessica Wang
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy;
>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is
>your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>
>Florin,
>
>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
>
>Jessica
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
>
>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
>then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
>updateNetworkServiceProvider
>. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
>can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
>and under what conditions?
>
>Thanks,
>Alena.
>
>
>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
><fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>>scratch on a minimal setup.
>>
>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.h
>>t
>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>>
>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>>using the GUI fix up from
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>>
>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>>None in the GUI:
>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>>
>>And none in the database:
>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>>
>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>>networks.
>>
>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>>
>>Any thoughts ?
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Florin
>>
>>
>>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Florin Dumitrascu <fl...@intunenetworks.com>.

Hi,

Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and enable it in the GUI.
But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).

Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using "package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.

Kind Regards,
Florin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Florin,
UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS service provider.
The reasons might be:
(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in Advanced zone)

Murali,
Is there other possibility?

Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Wang
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Florin,

Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
updateNetworkServiceProvider
. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
and under what conditions?

Thanks,
Alena.

On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>scratch on a minimal setup.
>
>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.ht
>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>
>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>using the GUI fix up from
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>
>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>None in the GUI:
>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>
>And none in the database:
>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>
>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>networks.
>
>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Best Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.

Florin, 
UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS service provider. 
The reasons might be:
(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in Advanced zone)


Murali,
Is there other possibility?


Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Wang 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Florin,

Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
updateNetworkServiceProvider
. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
and under what conditions?

Thanks,
Alena.


On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>scratch on a minimal setup.
>
>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.ht
>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>
>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>using the GUI fix up from
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>
>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>None in the GUI:
>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>
>And none in the database:
>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>
>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>networks.
>
>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Best Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.

Florin,

Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Jessica

-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
updateNetworkServiceProvider
. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
and under what conditions?

Thanks,
Alena.


On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>scratch on a minimal setup.
>
>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.ht
>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>
>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>using the GUI fix up from
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>
>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>None in the GUI:
>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>
>And none in the database:
>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>
>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>networks.
>
>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Best Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and
then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use
addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use
updateNetworkServiceProvider
. Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica,
can you check out if the UI supports adding physical network providers,
and under what conditions?

Thanks,
Alena.


On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
<fl...@intunenetworks.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from
>scratch on a minimal setup.
>
>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1
>to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.ht
>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
>
>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network offering
>using the GUI fix up from
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
>
>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical network,
>but discovered that no such provider is created.
>None in the GUI:
>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
>
>And none in the database:
>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
>
>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from
>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical
>networks.
>
>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Best Regards,
>Florin
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
>confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other
>than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept
>any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it
>has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the
>message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.