You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> on 2013/08/29 16:36:53 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.1 [was v4.0.0]
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 25, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Yongming Zhao <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> tested on Fedora 18 x86_64, build & installed with rpm. working in
> reverse mode with SSL termination.
> >>
> >> +1
> >
> >
> > We'll respin this release today, as v4.0.1, which will include the
> following two low risk fixes:
> >
> > • [TS-2154] - Lua plugin asserts traffic_server on startup
> > • [TS-2161] - TSHttpTxnHookAdd memory Leak
> >
>
>
> The new packages are available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 6069974 Aug 27 22:42
> trafficserver-4.0.1.tar.bz2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Aug 27 22:42
> trafficserver-4.0.1.tar.bz2.asc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 62 Aug 27 22:42
> trafficserver-4.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 70 Aug 27 22:42
> trafficserver-4.0.1.tar.bz2.sha1
>
>
> MD5: 9f68a20f0c1ae81c4ab41d6fc8810b35
> SHA1: 0f924d830541f0d31c89be12054a1b983d07435f
>
>
> The only (minor) changes are the two bugs above. I'm not restarting the
> entire vote process, but will call the votes on v4.0.1 on Friday EOB.
> Please cast your votes again even if you already voted for v4.0.0, to make
> sure we get consensus on this candidate.
>
>
One of the fixes that went in to 4.0.1 was affecting us and we'd like to
verify that it fixed our problem. Is it a big deal to get the weekend to
let it run some more and we release first thing Tuesday?
> Note that v4.0.0 is blown, and doesn't exist. 4.0.1 is the next stable
> release, and hopefully what we will release on Friday.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Leif
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.1 [was v4.0.0]
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:36 AM, Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> MD5: 9f68a20f0c1ae81c4ab41d6fc8810b35
>> SHA1: 0f924d830541f0d31c89be12054a1b983d07435f
>>
>>
>> The only (minor) changes are the two bugs above. I'm not restarting the
>> entire vote process, but will call the votes on v4.0.1 on Friday EOB.
>> Please cast your votes again even if you already voted for v4.0.0, to make
>> sure we get consensus on this candidate.
>>
>>
> One of the fixes that went in to 4.0.1 was affecting us and we'd like to
> verify that it fixed our problem. Is it a big deal to get the weekend to
> let it run some more and we release first thing Tuesday?
Yeah, it's Friday, or we respin. You can certainly -1 it.
Cheers,
-- Leif