You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org> on 2004/09/07 10:05:23 UTC
validation properties (Was: svn commit: rev 43442)
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > Author: crossley
> > Date: Mon Sep 6 18:50:54 2004
> > New Revision: 43442
> >
> > Modified:
> > forrest/trunk/src/core/fresh-site/forrest.properties
> > Log:
> > Synchronise with default.forrest.properties
> > Also bring back the mechanism to switch off certain parts of the validation.
> > These settings seemed to be accidently removed at r9099 2004-01-04
>
> It was done on purpose as AFAIK we had decided to validate everything
> and have only one generic exclusion property. This reduces complexity
> and should not really sacrifice functionality.
We needed to use it recently:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=260&msgNo=547
So obviously that ability is still required. I must have had
a New Year's hangover when that old commit message came through :-)
--
David Crossley
Re: validation properties (Was: svn commit: rev 43442)
Posted by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>.
David Crossley wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>>Author: crossley
>>>Date: Mon Sep 6 18:50:54 2004
>>>New Revision: 43442
>>>
>>>Modified:
>>> forrest/trunk/src/core/fresh-site/forrest.properties
>>>Log:
>>>Synchronise with default.forrest.properties
>>>Also bring back the mechanism to switch off certain parts of the validation.
>>>These settings seemed to be accidently removed at r9099 2004-01-04
>>
>>It was done on purpose as AFAIK we had decided to validate everything
>>and have only one generic exclusion property. This reduces complexity
>>and should not really sacrifice functionality.
>
> We needed to use it recently:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=260&msgNo=547
>
> So obviously that ability is still required.
It's not that obvious to me... I don't think that we should be keeping a
feature to route round Forrest deficiencies :-P
> I must have had
> a New Year's hangover when that old commit message came through :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------