Re: [STATUS] Fri Jun 6 08:12:55 EDT 1997

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >  * Debate branching
> 
> Hasn't that bit finished?

Roy raises some good questions and suggestions on this topic. The 
CVS archive has been branched for 1.2.x development. What we do 
with the HEAD is up to us. Be it 1.3 development or 2.0. 

Roy raises concern about the size that the CVS database will reach 
if we don't create a new repository for apache2. Seems that at 
least in the initial few months, it could be useful to easily diff 
against older versions of Apache. ?? Carefully bringing up the 
example of FreeBSD.... Apache is a much smaller codebase and seems 
that it would not be a problem to maintain all versions in the same 
repository.  ??


> > Post 1.2:
> > ---------
> 
> Also 1.3 - NT/95 support...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben.

Ah, I thought I remembered a good reason for 1.3.

> -- 
> Ben Laurie                Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435  Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
> Freelance Consultant and  Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
> Technical Director        URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
> A.L. Digital Ltd,         Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)
> London, England.          Apache-SSL author