Re: Documentation for DynaForms (deprecating the need for the ActionForm?)

[Vincent Stoessel <vi...@xaymaca.com>]

So is this going to send ActionForm to the land of the dinosaurs?
It uses a default validation method I assume?

That is fine with me actually, one less component named Action* in this 
framework is a big win IMO.


Ted Husted wrote:
> There's suprisingly little to it. The DynaForms are based on the 
> DynaBeans  (see Jakarta Commons). There's patch pending for the user 
> guide [12315],  but basically you do something like this
> 
>     <form-bean      name="logonForm" 
> type="org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm">
>       <form-property name="username" type="java.lang.String"/>
>       <form-property name="password" type="java.lang.String"/>
>     </form-bean>
> 
> To specify an initial value, add an initial attribute to the 
> <form-property> element. But that's pretty much all you need to do to 
> get started.
> 
> -T.
> 
> Vilya Harvey wrote:
> 
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm probably missing something obvious, but I haven't been able to 
>> find any
>> documentation for DynaForms anywhere. Does anyone have some kind of
>> reference that they can point me towards?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Vil.
>> -- 
>> Vilya Harvey, Consultant
>> vilya.harvey@digitalsteps.com                 / digital steps /
>> (W) +44 (0)1483 469 480
>> (M) +44 (0)7816 678 457                 http://www.digitalsteps.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Vincent Stoessel
Linux Systems Developer
vincent xaymaca.com