You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by xokao <xo...@hotmail.com> on 2008/10/09 11:13:19 UTC
A bug or A intent design while useing using consumer.receive()
when using consumer.receive() to receive messages from a selected broker,
if i shutdown the selected broker . the consumer.receive() didn't throw
any Exception . Nevertheless ExceptionListener or TransferListener can
catch the disconnected exception , but i thought that the client consumer
still not know the server is shutdown,and continue receive message from the
broker. i shoud write more code to stop the client by the Exception catch
by the Exceptionlistener or TransferListener.
this issue was found when i user DefaultMessageListenerContainer in
spring-jms api to receive message from a broker, as i use openjms it cound
work well,even if i shutdown the broker and then startup it. by while i
change the jms provider with AMQ5.1. it cant recover from after broker is
restarted. after traced into the codes, i found this problem .
is this a bug or the desginer intented to design as it ?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-bug-or-A-intent-design--while-useing-using-consumer.receive%28%29-tp19895165p19895165.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: A bug or A intent design while useing using consumer.receive()
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
BTW the default in ActiveMQ from 5.2 onwards is now to use the
failover transport - so unless you disable it or change the failover
protocol, it will silently reconnect and recover for you without
Spring having to do anything
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
2008/10/9 xokao <xo...@hotmail.com>:
>
> when using consumer.receive() to receive messages from a selected broker,
> if i shutdown the selected broker . the consumer.receive() didn't throw
> any Exception . Nevertheless ExceptionListener or TransferListener can
> catch the disconnected exception , but i thought that the client consumer
> still not know the server is shutdown,and continue receive message from the
> broker. i shoud write more code to stop the client by the Exception catch
> by the Exceptionlistener or TransferListener.
>
>
> this issue was found when i user DefaultMessageListenerContainer in
> spring-jms api to receive message from a broker, as i use openjms it cound
> work well,even if i shutdown the broker and then startup it. by while i
> change the jms provider with AMQ5.1. it cant recover from after broker is
> restarted. after traced into the codes, i found this problem .
>
> is this a bug or the desginer intented to design as it ?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-bug-or-A-intent-design--while-useing-using-consumer.receive%28%29-tp19895165p19895165.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com