You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> on 2015/05/01 01:26:28 UTC
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
The build is broken with Hadoop-2.2 because mini-kdc is not found:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project hbase-server: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:jar:1.1.0: Could not
find artifact org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-minikdc:jar:2.2
We are saying that 1.1 supports 2.2, but not tested. We can either decide
to drop support for 2.2, or sink the RC and fix the isssue.
Enis
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This is a VOTE thread. This discussion is highly off topic. Please drop
> dev@ from the CC and change the subject.
>
>
>
> > On Apr 30, 2015, at 7:30 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > And the following:
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > <artifactId>hbase-protocol</artifactId>
> > <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > <artifactId>hbase-hadoop-compat</artifactId>
> > <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> >
> >> most probably something like this:
> >>
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>hbase-client</artifactId>
> >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> >> </dependency>
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>hbase-server</artifactId>
> >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> >> </dependency>
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>hbase-common</artifactId>
> >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> >> </dependency>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015-04-30 10:25 GMT-04:00 Jeetendra Gangele <ga...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> I have added below line but this not bringing the required jars
> >>>
> >>> <repositories>
> >>> <repository>
> >>> <id>Hbase-1.1.0</id>
> >>> <url>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> >>> </url>
> >>> </repository>
> >>> </repositories>
> >>>
> >>>> On 30 April 2015 at 19:50, Jeetendra Gangele <ga...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> will it be possible for you to give me below
> >>>>
> >>>> Artifact Id,GrouId and version.
> >>>> if this is not possible how to add this repository is Pom.xml?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 19:28, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeetendra:
> >>>>> Add the following repo in your pom.xml (<repositories> section):
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then you can use 1.1.0 for hbase version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Jeetendra Gangele <
> >>> gangele397@gmail.com
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I means how to include in pom.xml
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 11:36, Jeetendra Gangele <gangele397@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How to include this is project code any sample?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 11:32, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope, you're right. That link should be
> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.0RC0/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Ashish Singhi <
> >>>>>>>> ashish.singhi.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Nick.
> >>>>>>>>> bq. (HBase-1.1.0RC0) is available for download at
> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.0.1RC2/
> >>>>>>>>> The above url is correct ? from the name it does not seems to
> >> be.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -- Ashish
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
> >>>>> ndimiduk@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase
> >>> 1.1.0
> >>>>>>>>>> (HBase-1.1.0RC0) is available for download at
> >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.0.1RC2/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey
> >>>>> 0xAD9039071C3489BD,
> >>>>>>>>>> available in the Apache keys directory
> >>>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc and in
> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/KEY
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There's also a signed tag for this release at
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=2c102dbe56116ca342abd08e906d70d900048a55
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> HBase 1.1.0 is the first minor release in the HBase 1.x line,
> >>>>>>>> continuing
> >>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the
> >> Hadoop
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> NoSQL
> >>>>>>>>>> communities. This release includes nearly 200 resolved issues
> >>>>> above
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.0.x series to date. Notable features include:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - Async RPC client (HBASE-12684)
> >>>>>>>>>> - Simple RPC throttling (HBASE-11598)
> >>>>>>>>>> - Improved compaction controls (HBASE-8329, HBASE-12859)
> >>>>>>>>>> - New extension interfaces for coprocessor users, better
> >>>>> supporting
> >>>>>>>>>> projects like Phoenix (HBASE-12972, HBASE-12975)
> >>>>>>>>>> - Per-column family flush (HBASE-10201)
> >>>>>>>>>> - WAL on SSD (HBASE-12848)
> >>>>>>>>>> - BlockCache in Memcached (HBASE-13170)
> >>>>>>>>>> - Tons of region replica enhancements around META, WAL, and
> >>> bulk
> >>>>>>>> loading
> >>>>>>>>>> (HBASE-11574, HBASE-11568, HBASE-11571, HBASE-11567)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The full list of issues can be found at
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12329043
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by midnight
> >> Pacific
> >>>>> time
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-06 as to whether we should release these bits as
> >> HBase
> >>>>>> 1.1.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Nick
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
If we're extending the vote I can find time to verify if running against
2.2 after using our default build fails. So long as running works, I think
we can just release note the build problem for now.
If running fails I'd vote for sinking, given how easy a fix is.
--
Sean
On May 5, 2015 4:17 PM, "Nick Dimiduk" <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the
> poms and sinking the RC?
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > > independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> > > rarely changes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> dependencies
> > from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> > hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> Checked the documentation. Both the index.html and book are in the old
> format. Nick did you copy the docs from master? This is unfortunate, but
> not a blocker to the RC.
>
I did copy the docs over, but must be there's pom changes that happened on
master after branch-1.1 was cut.
https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/4f5b22bc19cb8d24ced5d42ebd9794cfd83bae85
Going through the compat report:
> https://people.apache.org/~enis/1.0.1_1.1.0RC0_compat_report.html, a
> couple
> of interesting things:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551 missed 2 classes
> related to proc v2. They should not be Public.
>
> - AuthUtil should not be Public.
>
Okay, I've opened HBASE-13661 for this one. Mind commenting there with the
proc v2 class names?
This seems source incompatibility:
>
> - RegionScanner.nextRaw ( java.util.List<org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell> p1,
> int p2 ) [abstract] *:* boolean
>
> My vote would be -0, since the RegionScanner.nextRaw() although not used
> much is a concerning change and breaks source compat.
>
The RegionScanner change should be acceptable because it's marked as
Evolving, though let's discuss. The change came in as part of HBASE-13421:
https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/408b9161754966af80be5046fea657769b24f6a0#diff-87a7898ef24244574a843648feac86b7
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm also traveling today.
> >
> > I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one
> has
> > said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Formally, -0
> > >
> > > Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> > > Friday?
> > >
> > > I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't
> be
> > > able to get to it until tonight.
> > >
> > > > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> > > >
> > > > Is this a formal -1?
> > > >
> > > > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed
> and
> > > > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> > > >
> > > >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or
> > updating
> > > >> the
> > > >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > apurtell@apache.org>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > > >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone
> > and
> > > >>>>> rarely changes.
> > > >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> > > >> dependencies
> > > >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving
> the
> > > >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Sean
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> Checked the documentation. Both the index.html and book are in the old
> format. Nick did you copy the docs from master? This is unfortunate, but
> not a blocker to the RC.
>
I did copy the docs over, but must be there's pom changes that happened on
master after branch-1.1 was cut.
https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/4f5b22bc19cb8d24ced5d42ebd9794cfd83bae85
Going through the compat report:
> https://people.apache.org/~enis/1.0.1_1.1.0RC0_compat_report.html, a
> couple
> of interesting things:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551 missed 2 classes
> related to proc v2. They should not be Public.
>
> - AuthUtil should not be Public.
>
Okay, I've opened HBASE-13661 for this one. Mind commenting there with the
proc v2 class names?
This seems source incompatibility:
>
> - RegionScanner.nextRaw ( java.util.List<org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell> p1,
> int p2 ) [abstract] *:* boolean
>
> My vote would be -0, since the RegionScanner.nextRaw() although not used
> much is a concerning change and breaks source compat.
>
The RegionScanner change should be acceptable because it's marked as
Evolving, though let's discuss. The change came in as part of HBASE-13421:
https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/408b9161754966af80be5046fea657769b24f6a0#diff-87a7898ef24244574a843648feac86b7
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm also traveling today.
> >
> > I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one
> has
> > said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Formally, -0
> > >
> > > Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> > > Friday?
> > >
> > > I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't
> be
> > > able to get to it until tonight.
> > >
> > > > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> > > >
> > > > Is this a formal -1?
> > > >
> > > > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed
> and
> > > > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> > > >
> > > >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or
> > updating
> > > >> the
> > > >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > apurtell@apache.org>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > > >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone
> > and
> > > >>>>> rarely changes.
> > > >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> > > >> dependencies
> > > >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving
> the
> > > >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Sean
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
Here are my tests so far:
checked sigs, crcs
build src tarsal with hadoop 2.3, 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2 and 2.6.0.
Build with Hadoop-2.2.0 is broken as previous mail. I don’t think we should
sink the RC for this.
run local mode
simple tests from shell
Build with downstreamer
checked dir layouts
checked jar files
checked version, tag,
Checked the documentation. Both the index.html and book are in the old
format. Nick did you copy the docs from master? This is unfortunate, but
not a blocker to the RC.
Run wiht LTT with 1M load on local mode and 5 node cluster. Seems fine.
Run with different block encoding and compression algorithms
Run 1.0.1 and 0.98.12 clients against 1.1.0 server, some smoke tests (list,
scan) and LTT
Going through the compat report:
https://people.apache.org/~enis/1.0.1_1.1.0RC0_compat_report.html, a couple
of interesting things:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551 missed 2 classes
related to proc v2. They should not be Public.
- AuthUtil should not be Public.
This seems source incompatibility:
- RegionScanner.nextRaw ( java.util.List<org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell> p1,
int p2 ) [abstract] *:* boolean
My vote would be -0, since the RegionScanner.nextRaw() although not used
much is a concerning change and breaks source compat.
Enis
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm also traveling today.
>
> I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one has
> said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Formally, -0
> >
> > Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> > Friday?
> >
> > I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be
> > able to get to it until tonight.
> >
> > > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> > >
> > > Is this a formal -1?
> > >
> > > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> > > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> > >
> > >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or
> updating
> > >> the
> > >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone
> and
> > >>>>> rarely changes.
> > >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> > >> dependencies
> > >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> > >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sean
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
Here are my tests so far:
checked sigs, crcs
build src tarsal with hadoop 2.3, 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2 and 2.6.0.
Build with Hadoop-2.2.0 is broken as previous mail. I don’t think we should
sink the RC for this.
run local mode
simple tests from shell
Build with downstreamer
checked dir layouts
checked jar files
checked version, tag,
Checked the documentation. Both the index.html and book are in the old
format. Nick did you copy the docs from master? This is unfortunate, but
not a blocker to the RC.
Run wiht LTT with 1M load on local mode and 5 node cluster. Seems fine.
Run with different block encoding and compression algorithms
Run 1.0.1 and 0.98.12 clients against 1.1.0 server, some smoke tests (list,
scan) and LTT
Going through the compat report:
https://people.apache.org/~enis/1.0.1_1.1.0RC0_compat_report.html, a couple
of interesting things:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551 missed 2 classes
related to proc v2. They should not be Public.
- AuthUtil should not be Public.
This seems source incompatibility:
- RegionScanner.nextRaw ( java.util.List<org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell> p1,
int p2 ) [abstract] *:* boolean
My vote would be -0, since the RegionScanner.nextRaw() although not used
much is a concerning change and breaks source compat.
Enis
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm also traveling today.
>
> I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one has
> said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Formally, -0
> >
> > Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> > Friday?
> >
> > I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be
> > able to get to it until tonight.
> >
> > > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> > >
> > > Is this a formal -1?
> > >
> > > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> > > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> > >
> > >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or
> updating
> > >> the
> > >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone
> and
> > >>>>> rarely changes.
> > >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> > >> dependencies
> > >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> > >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sean
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
I'm also traveling today.
I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one has
said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Formally, -0
>
> Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> Friday?
>
> I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be
> able to get to it until tonight.
>
> > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> >
> > Is this a formal -1?
> >
> > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> >
> >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> >> the
> >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> >>>>> rarely changes.
> >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> >> dependencies
> >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sean
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
I'm also traveling today.
I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one has
said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Formally, -0
>
> Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> Friday?
>
> I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be
> able to get to it until tonight.
>
> > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> >
> > Is this a formal -1?
> >
> > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> >
> >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> >> the
> >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> >>>>> rarely changes.
> >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> >> dependencies
> >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sean
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Formally, -0
Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on Friday?
I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be able to get to it until tonight.
> On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I prefer to patch the POMs.
>
> Is this a formal -1?
>
> I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> I'll spin a new RC tonight.
>
>>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
>> the
>>> poms and sinking the RC?
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
>>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
>>>>> rarely changes.
>>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
>> dependencies
>>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
>>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Formally, -0
Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on Friday?
I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be able to get to it until tonight.
> On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I prefer to patch the POMs.
>
> Is this a formal -1?
>
> I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> I'll spin a new RC tonight.
>
>>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
>> the
>>> poms and sinking the RC?
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
>>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
>>>>> rarely changes.
>>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
>> dependencies
>>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
>>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I prefer to patch the POMs.
>
Is this a formal -1?
I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> the
> > poms and sinking the RC?
> >
> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> >>> rarely changes.
> >> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> dependencies
> >> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I prefer to patch the POMs.
>
Is this a formal -1?
I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> the
> > poms and sinking the RC?
> >
> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> >>> rarely changes.
> >> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> dependencies
> >> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
I prefer to patch the POMs.
> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the
> poms and sinking the RC?
>
>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
>>> rarely changes.
>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating dependencies
>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>>
>> --
>> Sean
>>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the
poms and sinking the RC?
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> > independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> > rarely changes.
> >
> >
> >
> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating dependencies
> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>
> --
> Sean
>
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
> rarely changes.
>
>
>
+1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating dependencies
from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
--
Sean
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
rarely changes.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> The build is broken with Hadoop-2.2 because mini-kdc is not found:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project hbase-server: Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:jar:1.1.0: Could not
> find artifact org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-minikdc:jar:2.2
>
> We are saying that 1.1 supports 2.2, but not tested. We can either decide
> to drop support for 2.2, or sink the RC and fix the isssue.
>
> Enis
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is a VOTE thread. This discussion is highly off topic. Please drop
> > dev@ from the CC and change the subject.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 30, 2015, at 7:30 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > And the following:
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>hbase-protocol</artifactId>
> > > <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>hbase-hadoop-compat</artifactId>
> > > <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> most probably something like this:
> > >>
> > >> <dependency>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>hbase-client</artifactId>
> > >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > >> </dependency>
> > >> <dependency>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>hbase-server</artifactId>
> > >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > >> </dependency>
> > >> <dependency>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.hbase</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>hbase-common</artifactId>
> > >> <version>${hbase.version}</version>
> > >> </dependency>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2015-04-30 10:25 GMT-04:00 Jeetendra Gangele <ga...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> I have added below line but this not bringing the required jars
> > >>>
> > >>> <repositories>
> > >>> <repository>
> > >>> <id>Hbase-1.1.0</id>
> > >>> <url>
> > >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> > >>> </url>
> > >>> </repository>
> > >>> </repositories>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 30 April 2015 at 19:50, Jeetendra Gangele <ga...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> will it be possible for you to give me below
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Artifact Id,GrouId and version.
> > >>>> if this is not possible how to add this repository is Pom.xml?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 19:28, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jeetendra:
> > >>>>> Add the following repo in your pom.xml (<repositories> section):
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Then you can use 1.1.0 for hbase version.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Jeetendra Gangele <
> > >>> gangele397@gmail.com
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I means how to include in pom.xml
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 11:36, Jeetendra Gangele <
> gangele397@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> How to include this is project code any sample?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 30 April 2015 at 11:32, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Nope, you're right. That link should be
> > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.0RC0/
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Ashish Singhi <
> > >>>>>>>> ashish.singhi.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Nick.
> > >>>>>>>>> bq. (HBase-1.1.0RC0) is available for download at
> > >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.0.1RC2/
> > >>>>>>>>> The above url is correct ? from the name it does not seems to
> > >> be.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -- Ashish
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
> > >>>>> ndimiduk@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase
> > >>> 1.1.0
> > >>>>>>>>>> (HBase-1.1.0RC0) is available for download at
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.0.1RC2/
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1076
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey
> > >>>>> 0xAD9039071C3489BD,
> > >>>>>>>>>> available in the Apache keys directory
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc and in
> > >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/KEY
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> There's also a signed tag for this release at
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=2c102dbe56116ca342abd08e906d70d900048a55
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> HBase 1.1.0 is the first minor release in the HBase 1.x line,
> > >>>>>>>> continuing
> > >>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the
> > >> Hadoop
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>> NoSQL
> > >>>>>>>>>> communities. This release includes nearly 200 resolved issues
> > >>>>> above
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.0.x series to date. Notable features include:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Async RPC client (HBASE-12684)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Simple RPC throttling (HBASE-11598)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Improved compaction controls (HBASE-8329, HBASE-12859)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - New extension interfaces for coprocessor users, better
> > >>>>> supporting
> > >>>>>>>>>> projects like Phoenix (HBASE-12972, HBASE-12975)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Per-column family flush (HBASE-10201)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - WAL on SSD (HBASE-12848)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - BlockCache in Memcached (HBASE-13170)
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Tons of region replica enhancements around META, WAL, and
> > >>> bulk
> > >>>>>>>> loading
> > >>>>>>>>>> (HBASE-11574, HBASE-11568, HBASE-11571, HBASE-11567)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> The full list of issues can be found at
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12329043
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by midnight
> > >> Pacific
> > >>>>> time
> > >>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-06 as to whether we should release these bits as
> > >> HBase
> > >>>>>> 1.1.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Nick
> > >>
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
So we're also dropping support for 2.2 for releases 1.0.x too ?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > The build is broken with Hadoop-2.2 because mini-kdc is not found:
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project hbase-server: Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:jar:1.1.0: Could
> not
> > find artifact org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-minikdc:jar:2.2
> >
> > We are saying that 1.1 supports 2.2, but not tested. We can either decide
> > to drop support for 2.2, or sink the RC and fix the isssue.
> >
>
> Good find Enis.
>
> Let us drop support for a release made in October of 2013.
>
> St.Ack
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> The build is broken with Hadoop-2.2 because mini-kdc is not found:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project hbase-server: Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:jar:1.1.0: Could not
> find artifact org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-minikdc:jar:2.2
>
> We are saying that 1.1 supports 2.2, but not tested. We can either decide
> to drop support for 2.2, or sink the RC and fix the isssue.
>
Good find Enis.
Let us drop support for a release made in October of 2013.
St.Ack