You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de> on 2012/09/17 14:54:53 UTC

[DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Hi all,

I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for 
the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as 
they are not published):

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html

Some notes before you start with checking out:

1.
The latest consensus about the new directory structure on mirrors shows 
(IMHO) the following that I've used:

.../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/
.../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
.../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/

2.
Only the binaries are working for now. The checksum files are still 
coming form the old structure.

3.
But they are no real binaries, just dummy test files with meaningful 
content. ;-)

Now happy testing.

And don't forget to use the following webpage to support your error reports:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html

Thanks in advance for your comments.

Marcus


Re: [DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 09/17/2012 06:45 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
>> the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
>> they are not published):
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html
>
> Thanks! Detection worked fine for me, but apparently the filenames in
> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/3.4.1/binaries/it/
> contain a trailing carriage return (!), so I get a "File not Found"
> error. However, the link assembled by the download page is right, the
> error is just in the dummy files used for testing.

Right, that was an issue when copying some scripts to my Apache account. 
I've corrected it now.

Thanks for the hint.

Marcus


Re: [DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
> the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
> they are not published):
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html

Thanks! Detection worked fine for me, but apparently the filenames in
http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/3.4.1/binaries/it/
contain a trailing carriage return (!), so I get a "File not Found" 
error. However, the link assembled by the download page is right, the 
error is just in the dummy files used for testing.

Regards,
   Andrea.

Re: [DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 09/17/2012 03:35 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 09/17/2012 11:40 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>>
>> On 09/17/2012 05:54 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
>>> the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
>>> they are not published):
>>>
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html
>>>
>>> Some notes before you start with checking out:
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> The latest consensus about the new directory structure on mirrors shows
>>> (IMHO) the following that I've used:
>>>
>>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/
>>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
>>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/
>>>
>>> 2.
>>> Only the binaries are working for now. The checksum files are still
>>> coming form the old structure.
>>>
>>> 3.
>>> But they are no real binaries, just dummy test files with meaningful
>>> content. ;-)
>>
>> ummm...I'm getting a Not Found for my "binary"....
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/3.4.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this what's supposed to happen????
>>
>> OK, more info...the en-GB link seems to do something but not en-US...so
>> maybe just a permission thing with this one file.
>
> Have you already looked at the "analyze.html" webpage? Is there more
> shown wrong?

Oh boy...what can I say. Obviously gremlins before! Everything fine 
now...it could have been a server blip or something.

The analysis was correct, and the link looked to be correct, the one 
mentioned above, but I got the "404" on it.

So, all good
>
>> Generally, so far, so good.
>>
>> This is definitely moving along well! :)
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>> Now happy testing.
>>>
>>> And don't forget to use the following webpage to support your error
>>> reports:
>>>
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your comments.
>>>
>>> Marcus

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"We never sit anything out. We are cups, constantly and quietly
  being filled.  The trick is, knowing how to tip ourselves over and
  let the beautiful stuff out."
                          -- Ray Bradbury, "Zen in the Art of Writing"


Re: [DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 09/17/2012 11:40 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>
> On 09/17/2012 05:54 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
>> the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
>> they are not published):
>>
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html
>>
>> Some notes before you start with checking out:
>>
>> 1.
>> The latest consensus about the new directory structure on mirrors shows
>> (IMHO) the following that I've used:
>>
>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/
>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
>> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/
>>
>> 2.
>> Only the binaries are working for now. The checksum files are still
>> coming form the old structure.
>>
>> 3.
>> But they are no real binaries, just dummy test files with meaningful
>> content. ;-)
>
> ummm...I'm getting a Not Found for my "binary"....
>
> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/3.4.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>
>
> Is this what's supposed to happen????
>
> OK, more info...the en-GB link seems to do something but not en-US...so
> maybe just a permission thing with this one file.

Have you already looked at the "analyze.html" webpage? Is there more 
shown wrong?

> Generally, so far, so good.
>
> This is definitely moving along well! :)

Thanks for testing.

Marcus



>> Now happy testing.
>>
>> And don't forget to use the following webpage to support your error
>> reports:
>>
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your comments.
>>
>> Marcus

Re: [DL][Website] Second draft of the new DL scripting

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.

On 09/17/2012 05:54 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
> the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
> they are not published):
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html
>
> Some notes before you start with checking out:
>
> 1.
> The latest consensus about the new directory structure on mirrors shows
> (IMHO) the following that I've used:
>
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/
>
> 2.
> Only the binaries are working for now. The checksum files are still
> coming form the old structure.
>
> 3.
> But they are no real binaries, just dummy test files with meaningful
> content. ;-)

ummm...I'm getting a Not Found for my "binary"....

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/3.4.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Is this what's supposed to happen????

OK, more info...the en-GB link seems to do something but not en-US...so 
maybe just a permission thing with this one file.

Generally, so far, so good.

This is definitely moving along well! :)

>
> Now happy testing.
>
> And don't forget to use the following webpage to support your error
> reports:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments.
>
> Marcus
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"We never sit anything out. We are cups, constantly and quietly
  being filled.  The trick is, knowing how to tip ourselves over and
  let the beautiful stuff out."
                          -- Ray Bradbury, "Zen in the Art of Writing"