You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2009/09/24 07:01:33 UTC
OFBiz site as an application
Hi,
I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we update it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
Jacques
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by André Herbst <ah...@softmatic.dk>.
Seems like a good idéa to me, as it really doesn't fit in anyway compared to
the other applications in the menu.
-André
On Thursday den 24. September 2009 07:01:33 Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that.
> It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we update it, we will have
> to update in the future, etc.
>
> Jacques
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>.
Hi Ean..
we already have our own machine....
http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/
now we have to find the time to move things over.
at the moment i see 500K of memory what is not enough to run all
instances....
but sure it is a start.
Regarding your question...no, we cannot move the ofbiz.apache.org to
this instance...not sure why not...so it is still up the air if we can
achieve this....
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:15 -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >> 4 eat our own dogfood.
> I thought the headache here was that ASF will not let us have our own
> machine? I probably missed something.
>
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Ean Schuessler <ea...@brainfood.com>.
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> 4 eat our own dogfood.
I thought the headache here was that ASF will not let us have our own
machine? I probably missed something.
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
ean@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Hans Bakker <ma...@antwebsystems.com>.
+1
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:23 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Back on this,
>
> Should we not be realistic and for marketing purpose simply have the home page translated (and possibly shown accordingly to
> language used)?
> It it really a big deal for our users?
>
> Thanks for your opinions (if any ;o)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> > BTW, it would be a very good mean to have all languages in svn repo!
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Inline...
> >>
> >> From: "Hans Bakker" <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
> >>> Hi Jacques.
> >>>
> >>> there are several reasons why i think it should be part of the
> >>> distribution:
> >>>
> >>> 1. It would be maintained much better because it is the same as changing
> >>> a program.
> >>
> >> If you use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site it's as easy as having it embedded.
> >>
> >>> 2. the ofbiz site should replace the cmssite and then have a perfect
> >>> demo of OFBiz CMS capabilities.
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree that would be a plus if done right (ie easily customisable, not only an inner HTML content)
> >>
> >>> 3. concerning the demo site, i think that should be as reliable as the
> >>> website....
> >>
> >> Mmm, should be...
> >>
> >>> 4 eat our own dogfood.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> It is on my list to convert the current site and i plan to do that in
> >>> the next 4 weeks.
> >>>
> >>> we mostly did it already, have a look at ofbiz.in.th which runs on ofbiz
> >>> and is VERY reliable.
> >>
> >> Indeed, that's solid arguments! Let's see what other thinks...
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Hans
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 11:03 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>>> Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz
> >>>> demo
> >>>> instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
> >>>> I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo instance the site would not be available. I think it's
> >>>> safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we
> >>>> update
> >>>> it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Ean Schuessler <ea...@brainfood.com>.
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Should we not be realistic and for marketing purpose simply have the
> home page translated (and possibly shown accordingly to language used)?
> It it really a big deal for our users?
+1
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
ean@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Back on this,
Should we not be realistic and for marketing purpose simply have the home page translated (and possibly shown accordingly to
language used)?
It it really a big deal for our users?
Thanks for your opinions (if any ;o)
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> BTW, it would be a very good mean to have all languages in svn repo!
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> Hans,
>>
>> Inline...
>>
>> From: "Hans Bakker" <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>>> Hi Jacques.
>>>
>>> there are several reasons why i think it should be part of the
>>> distribution:
>>>
>>> 1. It would be maintained much better because it is the same as changing
>>> a program.
>>
>> If you use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site it's as easy as having it embedded.
>>
>>> 2. the ofbiz site should replace the cmssite and then have a perfect
>>> demo of OFBiz CMS capabilities.
>>
>> Yes, I agree that would be a plus if done right (ie easily customisable, not only an inner HTML content)
>>
>>> 3. concerning the demo site, i think that should be as reliable as the
>>> website....
>>
>> Mmm, should be...
>>
>>> 4 eat our own dogfood.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> It is on my list to convert the current site and i plan to do that in
>>> the next 4 weeks.
>>>
>>> we mostly did it already, have a look at ofbiz.in.th which runs on ofbiz
>>> and is VERY reliable.
>>
>> Indeed, that's solid arguments! Let's see what other thinks...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 11:03 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz
>>>> demo
>>>> instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
>>>> I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo instance the site would not be available. I think it's
>>>> safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we
>>>> update
>>>> it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
BTW, it would be a very good mean to have all languages in svn repo!
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> Hans,
>
> Inline...
>
> From: "Hans Bakker" <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
>> Hi Jacques.
>>
>> there are several reasons why i think it should be part of the
>> distribution:
>>
>> 1. It would be maintained much better because it is the same as changing
>> a program.
>
> If you use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site it's as easy as having it embedded.
>
>> 2. the ofbiz site should replace the cmssite and then have a perfect
>> demo of OFBiz CMS capabilities.
>
> Yes, I agree that would be a plus if done right (ie easily customisable, not only an inner HTML content)
>
>> 3. concerning the demo site, i think that should be as reliable as the
>> website....
>
> Mmm, should be...
>
>> 4 eat our own dogfood.
>
> +1
>
>> It is on my list to convert the current site and i plan to do that in
>> the next 4 weeks.
>>
>> we mostly did it already, have a look at ofbiz.in.th which runs on ofbiz
>> and is VERY reliable.
>
> Indeed, that's solid arguments! Let's see what other thinks...
>
> Jacques
>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 11:03 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz
>>> demo
>>> instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
>>> I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo instance the site would not be available. I think it's
>>> safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we
>>> update
>>> it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>>
>
>
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hans,
Inline...
From: "Hans Bakker" <ma...@antwebsystems.com>
> Hi Jacques.
>
> there are several reasons why i think it should be part of the
> distribution:
>
> 1. It would be maintained much better because it is the same as changing
> a program.
If you use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site it's as easy as having it embedded.
> 2. the ofbiz site should replace the cmssite and then have a perfect
> demo of OFBiz CMS capabilities.
Yes, I agree that would be a plus if done right (ie easily customisable, not only an inner HTML content)
> 3. concerning the demo site, i think that should be as reliable as the
> website....
Mmm, should be...
> 4 eat our own dogfood.
+1
> It is on my list to convert the current site and i plan to do that in
> the next 4 weeks.
>
> we mostly did it already, have a look at ofbiz.in.th which runs on ofbiz
> and is VERY reliable.
Indeed, that's solid arguments! Let's see what other thinks...
Jacques
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 11:03 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz
>> demo
>> instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
>> I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo instance the site would not be available. I think it's
>> safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we update
>> it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
> --
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>
Re: OFBiz site as an application
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz demo
instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo instance the site would not be available. I think it's
safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
WDYT ?
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
Hi,
I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that. It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we update
it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
Jacques