Re: Board feedback on 2016-05-18 Turbine report

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

This is a perfect example of WHY I suggested the sender be
the shepherd. They should be talking to/replying to the
shepherd; not *you*.

> On May 22, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Thomas Vandahl <tv...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sam,
> 
> On 18.05.16 21:29, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Comments:
>> 
>>  mt: Does the PMC have a timescale in mind for a 4.0 release?
>> 
> 
> There have been a fair number of modifications between the 4.0M1 and the
> 4.0M2 release. Especially the removal of the old APIs turned out to be
> quite disruptive. We're currently porting over a few old applications as
> a proof-of-concept to collect some ideas what needs to be fixed before
> 4.0 final. If that works out ok, there is a good chance to push out 4.0
> final later this year.
> 
> HTH
> Bye, Thomas.
> 
> 
>