You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/03 02:44:03 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6535) Synchronous Lucene Property Indexes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16189192#comment-16189192 ] 

Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6535:
------------------------------------

[~chetanm], reviewed modified files (added are left). A few notes:
{noformat}
LIPService.java
+            tracker = new IndexTracker();
{noformat}
Do we require CoR for mounted stores and nrt?

Maybe, I missed it somewhere...:
* it seems we don't plan with prop idx when sort order is defined - that can be confusing... maybe a WARN?? ("warn", because it seems to me that query and def aren't in sync with each other)
* I can't see how are we skipping over prox idx in presence of a full text clause (also, we should warn if/when we skip prop idx iteration)

> Synchronous Lucene Property Indexes
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6535
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6535
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: lucene, property-index
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>         Attachments: OAK-6535-v1.diff
>
>
> Oak 1.6 added support for Lucene Hybrid Index (OAK-4412). That enables near real time (NRT) support for Lucene based indexes. It also had a limited support for sync indexes. This feature aims to improve that to next level and enable support for sync property indexes.
> More details at https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Synchronous%20Lucene%20Property%20Indexes



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)