You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Benjamin Papez (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/14 10:11:34 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-3738) CLONE - Deadlock on LOCAL_REVISION table in clustering environment

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Benjamin Papez updated JCR-3738:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: extended-log-with-dumps.txt

> CLONE - Deadlock on LOCAL_REVISION table in clustering environment
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3738
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3738
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: clustering
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.2
>         Environment: CQ5.6.1 with jackrabbit-core 2.6.2 backed off ibm db2 v10.5
>            Reporter: Ankush Malhotra
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: before-lock.zip, db-deadlock-info.txt, extended-log-with-dumps.txt, stat-cache.log, threaddumps.zip
>
>
> Original, cloned description:
> > When inserting a lot of nodes concurrently (100/200 threads) the system hangs generating a deadlock on the LOCAL_REVISION table.
> > There is a thread that starts a transaction but the transaction remains open, while another thread tries to acquire the lock on the table.
> > This actually happen even if there is only a server up but configured in cluster mode.
> > I found that in AbstractJournal, we try to write the LOCAL_REVISION even if we don't sync any record because they're generated by the same journal of the thread running.
> >
> > Removing this unnecessary (to me :-) ) write to the LOCAL_REVISION table, remove the deadlock.
> This might not be the exact same case with this issue. See the attached thread dumps etc. for full details.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)