Re: problem using archetype create-from-project to process files under resources folders.

[Milos Kleint <mk...@gmail.com>]

check the sources of the generic nbm archetype at codehaus.
http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-archetypes/nbm-archetype/

Milos

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Djohannot <da...@heig-vd.ch> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I have exactly the same problem. I use the Netbeans platform and the
> layer.xml, Bundle.properties, etc are in resources folder, and the
> archetype:generate-from-project keep the original folder hierarchy.
>
> dou you have found a way to tell Maven to modif the resources folders too?
>
> regards,
>
> David J.
>
>
>
> Trent Rosenbaum-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> > I am having a problem with the 'main/resources' and the 'test/resources'
> > folders when trying to generate an archetype from an example project.
> > Both
> > folders are preserving the original folder structures from the project
> > used
> > to generate the archetype.  The 'main/java' and the 'test/java' are
> > modified
> > to allow them to be placed into a new package structure when the
> archetype
> > is used for future projects.  Are the folders 'main/resources' and
> > 'test/resources' meant to work in this way?
> >
> > I would expect the 'resources' folders within the archetype to generate
> > the
> > new files in the same manner as the java folders.  I have a situation
> > where
> > junit test classes are locating Spring configuration files in the same
> > package.  I have the test class under the 'test/java' folder and the
> > configuration files under 'test/resources'.  When I run the
> > 'maven-archetype-plugin' over the example project, (a project that builds
> > and tests as expected) I get the java classes modified to except new
> > project
> > values, but the configuration files under resources folders are left
> under
> > the old package/folder structure.  After generation of the new project
> the
> > build fails because the tests cannot locate the appropriate configuration
> > files.  Is it expected that I should modify the generated archetype files
> > by
> > hand to place the configuration files in the correct location?  I have
> > been
> > using archetypes of a while, but have never noticed this before because I
> > always placed my configuration files at the route of 'main/resources' and
> > 'test/resources'.
> >
> > What are the plans for the archetype plugin going forward?  I get a sense
> > that things on the archetype front have gone quiet?
> >
> > Are there any other options and what is everyone else doing?  Any
> feedback
> > would be a great help.
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Trent
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/problem-using-archetype-create-from-project-to-process-files-under--resources-folders.-tp24772317p25696921.html
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>