[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENENET-366) Spellchecker issues

["Ben West (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863448#action_12863448 ] 

Ben West edited comment on LUCENENET-366 at 5/3/10 2:24 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Hey DIGY,

Java lucene doesn't have the duplicate checking - should I submit a bug to them?

EDIT: bah, I take it back. it does. Will work on porting.

      was (Author: xodarap):
    Hey DIGY,

Java lucene doesn't have the duplicate checking - should I submit a bug to them?

  
> Spellchecker issues
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ben West
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LuceneNet-SpellcheckFixes.patch
>
>
> There are several issues with the spellchecker:
> - It doesn't do duplicate checking across updates (so the same word is often indexed many, many times)
> - The n-gram fields are stored as well as indexed, which increases the size of the index by several orders of magnitude and provides no benefit
> - Some deprecated functions are used, which slows it down
> - Some methods aren't commented fully
> I will attach a patch that fixes these.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.