You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> on 2015/08/02 17:58:41 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
Apache jclouds 1.9.1. Please use this thread for discussion of issues
uncovered in the RC, questions you may have about the RC, etc.
Thank you!
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
Run the following live tests:
* aws-ec2: Tests run: 113, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 14
* digitalocean2: Tests run: 64, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 8
AWS tests are known ones that were considered low priority in previous
discussions.
The DigitalOcean failures are transient failures due to a VM that did
not shutdown in the configured timeout and a subsequent test that
assumes it in OFF state.
I've also created a script to compare the source tarballs with the Git
tag [1], to make sure the contents of the release are OK. It tkes as
input the path tot he folder where all source tarballs are, and then
validates them against the corresponding tag in each repo. Feel free
to test/fix/modify/play with it. Currently the tarballs only contain
the extra LICENSE, NOTICE, and DEPENDENCIES files that are
auto-generated by our Maven build when performing a release. Apart
from that all files match the tag, so we can consider the tarballs to
be OK.
I.
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jclouds/compare_tarball_tag.sh
On 3 August 2015 at 23:50, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1 - lgtm!
>
> Should this go to the VOTE thread?
>
> On 3 August 2015 at 14:19, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 - lgtm!
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just updated the fix version for the mentioned issues and the
>>> release notes should be OK now.
>>> Thanks for checking Arvind!
>>>
>>> On 2 August 2015 at 23:19, Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather than
>>> a
>>> > list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the
>>> announcement
>>> > - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for spotting that!
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> > ap
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
I always mess that up...
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1 - lgtm!
>
> Should this go to the VOTE thread?
>
> On 3 August 2015 at 14:19, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 - lgtm!
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I've just updated the fix version for the mentioned issues and the
> >> release notes should be OK now.
> >> Thanks for checking Arvind!
> >>
> >> On 2 August 2015 at 23:19, Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather
> than
> >> a
> >> > list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the
> >> announcement
> >> > - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for spotting that!
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > ap
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
> +1 - lgtm!
Should this go to the VOTE thread?
On 3 August 2015 at 14:19, Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 - lgtm!
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've just updated the fix version for the mentioned issues and the
>> release notes should be OK now.
>> Thanks for checking Arvind!
>>
>> On 2 August 2015 at 23:19, Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
>> >
>> >
>> > Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather than
>> a
>> > list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the
>> announcement
>> > - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
>> >
>> > Thanks for spotting that!
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > ap
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Andrew Bayer <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 - lgtm!
A.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've just updated the fix version for the mentioned issues and the
> release notes should be OK now.
> Thanks for checking Arvind!
>
> On 2 August 2015 at 23:19, Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
> >
> >
> > Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather than
> a
> > list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the
> announcement
> > - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
> >
> > Thanks for spotting that!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > ap
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
I've just updated the fix version for the mentioned issues and the
release notes should be OK now.
Thanks for checking Arvind!
On 2 August 2015 at 23:19, Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
>
>
> Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather than a
> list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the announcement
> - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
>
> Thanks for spotting that!
>
> Regards
>
> ap
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Andrew Phillips <an...@apache.org>.
> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
Luckily, since the VOTE thread only includes a link to JIRA (rather than
a list of the issues themselves), we shouldn't have to update the
announcement - just set the Fix Versions in JIRA correctly.
Thanks for spotting that!
Regards
ap
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Arvind N <ar...@gmail.com>.
also issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-333
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Arvind N <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following issues have not been marked as fixed in 1.9.1 in JIRA, so
> they dont show up in the release annoucement.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-851
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-958
>
> can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
>> Apache jclouds 1.9.1. Please use this thread for discussion of issues
>> uncovered in the RC, questions you may have about the RC, etc.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Arvind N
>
--
Arvind N
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Arvind N <ar...@gmail.com>.
The following issues have not been marked as fixed in 1.9.1 in JIRA, so
they dont show up in the release annoucement.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-851
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-958
can we mark them as fixed and update the annoucement?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
> Apache jclouds 1.9.1. Please use this thread for discussion of issues
> uncovered in the RC, questions you may have about the RC, etc.
>
> Thank you!
>
--
Arvind N
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
Google Compute Engine live tests:
Tests run: 163, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 5
The skipped tests are due to not having enough data to perform some
tests that expect the account to have a minimum number of disks.
On 4 August 2015 at 22:51, Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> I ran integration tests against atmos, azure, aws-s3, filesystem,
> google-cloud-storage, and rackspace-cloudfiles-us. GCS has two real
> issues with one tracked by JCLOUDS-912. Cloudfiles has a few failures
> that likely stem from eventual consistency.
>
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 05:58:41PM +0200, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
>> Apache jclouds 1.9.1. Please use this thread for discussion of issues
>> uncovered in the RC, questions you may have about the RC, etc.
>>
>> Thank you!
>
> --
> Andrew Gaul
> http://gaul.org/
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache jclouds 1.9.1 RC1
Posted by Andrew Gaul <ga...@apache.org>.
I ran integration tests against atmos, azure, aws-s3, filesystem,
google-cloud-storage, and rackspace-cloudfiles-us. GCS has two real
issues with one tracked by JCLOUDS-912. Cloudfiles has a few failures
that likely stem from eventual consistency.
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 05:58:41PM +0200, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> This thread is for discussion of the first release candidate for
> Apache jclouds 1.9.1. Please use this thread for discussion of issues
> uncovered in the RC, questions you may have about the RC, etc.
>
> Thank you!
--
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/