You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by "Daffin, Miles (Company IT)" <Mi...@morganstanley.com> on 2005/02/10 18:30:40 UTC

Constants for property names

Hi All,
 
What do people feel about using constants for property names?
 
In general I feel one should use constants for such things, but it is
far from easy in a web app to do so.
 
If I define a constants class (e.g. com.plok.app.constants.Keys) I can
use this in everywhere in java code and in *most* (not all) places in
the jsps. For example this works: 
 
<html:text property="<%=Keys.Section0.APPLICANT_NAME%>"/>
 
but this does not:
 
<jsp:param name="<%=Keys.APPLICANT_NAME%>" value="What Ever"/>
 
I have the same problem if I want to refer to this property in any of
the following places:
 
- jstl tags
- xml files (e.g. struts-config, validation)
 
Do you see what I mean?
 
 
So, what am I doing/thinking wrong? Should I forget about defining
constants? 
 
Am I getting my knickers in a twist over nothing?
 
-Miles
 
Miles Daffin
Morgan Stanley
20 Cabot Square | Canary Wharf | London E14 4QA | UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 767 75119
miles.daffin@morganstanley.com <ma...@morganstanley.com> 
--------------------------------------------------------
 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 

Re: Constants for property names

Posted by Laurent <lg...@free.fr>.
Daffin, Miles (Company IT) wrote:
> What do people feel about using constants for property names?
>  
> In general I feel one should use constants for such things, but it is
> far from easy in a web app to do so.

I can't really see the point. A property name is like a variable name, 
it will never be displayed or localized, so why would you ever want to 
change it?


> <html:text property="<%=Keys.Section0.APPLICANT_NAME%>"/>

Can you think of a case where this value won't be "applicantName"?


> - jstl tags
> - xml files (e.g. struts-config, validation)

Worse: if you have an ActionForm, you can't have a property whose name 
depends on a constant!! And what about getters and setters.


> Should I forget about defining
> constants?

Yes :)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org