You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/07/12 18:24:08 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10640] - attempt to sort decending produces error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10640>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10640

attempt to sort decending produces error

David_Marston@lotus.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|Major                       |Normal
           Keywords|                            |ErrorMessage, TestID,
                   |                            |XSLTBug
           Priority|Other                       |Low



------- Additional Comments From David_Marston@lotus.com  2002-07-12 16:24 -------
The correct spelling is "descending" and that works for me. (sort03, sort09,
etc. test it.) Then I tried sorterr02, which has an invalid value for the
order attribute. I got the correct message, but I also saw a
Warning: popContextNodeList when stack is empty!
so maybe we should try single-stepping through some of this code.
(I was using 2.4D1 in my tests.