You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to taglibs-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> on 2004/03/03 08:17:41 UTC

Re: Naming of the standard package

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Martin van Dijken wrote:

> Hey gang,
>
> On the user list I've recently seen a few questions regarding where to
> find a download of the JSTL implementation of Jakarta. Wouldn't it be
> more logical to name the package jakarta-jstl or something instead of
> standard?

Yes, it would. However, my understanding (Pierre et al, please correct me
if I'm wrong) is that, since JSTL is a Sun trademark, we can't use it in
the name of the taglib. We can, however, refer to the Standard taglib as
the Reference Implementation of JSTL.

--
Martin Cooper


>
> Grtz,
>
> Martin vD
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Naming of the standard package

Posted by Pierre Delisle <Pi...@Sun.COM>.
>>On the user list I've recently seen a few questions regarding where to
>>find a download of the JSTL implementation of Jakarta. Wouldn't it be
>>more logical to name the package jakarta-jstl or something instead of
>>standard?
> 
> 
> Yes, it would. However, my understanding (Pierre et al, please correct me
> if I'm wrong) is that, since JSTL is a Sun trademark, we can't use it in
> the name of the taglib. We can, however, refer to the Standard taglib as
> the Reference Implementation of JSTL.

Actually, JSTL is an acronym, and it is not trademarked by Sun.

I can't remember exactly why we did not name the library 'jstl'. Maybe
we thought at the time that it could become a trademark and wanted to
avoid the issue. Not sure...

At any rate, the taglibs home page clearly shows that 'standard'
is JSTL (see the left column). I don't think we'd want to go through
a name change at this point, but any suggestion to make it more obvious
that 'standard' is an implementation of JSTL is more than welcome.

    -- Pierre


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: taglibs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: taglibs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org