You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/14 19:55:47 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-723) ephemeral parent znodes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049309#comment-13049309 ] 

Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-723:
-----------------------------------------

if an ephemeral parent doesn't have a child, why wouldn't it be deleted? i ask this because we lose the chance to do sanity checks if there can be an ephemeral parent with no children.

> ephemeral parent znodes
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-723
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Benjamin Reed
>            Assignee: Daniel Gómez Ferro
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-723.patch
>
>
> ephemeral znodes have the nice property of automatically cleaning up after themselves when the creator goes away, but since they can't have children it is hard to build subtrees that will cleanup after the clients that are using them are gone.
> rather than changing the semantics of ephemeral nodes, i propose ephemeral parents: znodes that disappear when they have no more children. this cleanup would happen automatically when the last child is removed. an ephemeral parent is not tied to any particular session, so even if the creator goes away, the ephemeral parent will remain as long as there are children.
> the when an ephemeral parent is created it will have an initial child, so that it doesn't get immediately removed. i think this child should be an ephemeral znode with a predefined name, "firstChild".

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira