You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/21 17:06:04 UTC

Re: new 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch

HBase announced at the last 1.0 release that it would be the last release in that line and I think we would recommend any 1.0 user move up to 1.1 or 1.2 at their earliest convenience. FWIW

Also, as RM of the 0.98 code line I am considering ending its (mostly) regular release cadence at the end of this calendar year. I'd continue if there were expressed user or dev demand but otherwise place it into the same state as 1.0. Also FWIW. I'd be curious to hear how many Phoenix users are using 0.98 versus 1.0 and up, besides the folks at Salesforce, whom I know well (smile). And, more generally, who in greater HBase land is still on 0.98 and won't move off this year. 

> On Apr 20, 2016, at 5:00 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Due to some API changes in HBase, we need to have a separate branch for our
> HBase 1.1 compatible branches. I've created a 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch for this
> - please make sure to keep this branch in sync with the other 4.x and
> master branches. We can release 4.x-HBase-1.2 compatible releases out of
> master for 4.8. I think post 4.8 release we may not need to continue with
> the 4.x-HBase-1.0 branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> James

Re: new 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:

> >
> > Also FWIW. I'd be curious to hear how many Phoenix users are using 0.98
> >> versus 1.0 and up, besides the folks at Salesforce, whom I know well
> >> (smile). And, more generally, who in greater HBase land is still on 0.98
> >> and won't move off this year.
> >>
> >
> <vendor_hat> From our customers perspective, most of the users are 1.1+.
> The ones using 0.98-based HBase releases are not getting the latest Phoenix
> anyway through the vendor channels.
>
>
Thanks Enis, really appreciate the info.



>
> >> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 5:00 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Due to some API changes in HBase, we need to have a separate branch
> for
> >> our
> >> > HBase 1.1 compatible branches. I've created a 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch for
> >> this
> >> > - please make sure to keep this branch in sync with the other 4.x and
> >> > master branches. We can release 4.x-HBase-1.2 compatible releases out
> of
> >> > master for 4.8. I think post 4.8 release we may not need to continue
> >> with
> >> > the 4.x-HBase-1.0 branch.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > James
> >>
> >
>

Re: new 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:

> >
> > Also FWIW. I'd be curious to hear how many Phoenix users are using 0.98
> >> versus 1.0 and up, besides the folks at Salesforce, whom I know well
> >> (smile). And, more generally, who in greater HBase land is still on 0.98
> >> and won't move off this year.
> >>
> >
> <vendor_hat> From our customers perspective, most of the users are 1.1+.
> The ones using 0.98-based HBase releases are not getting the latest Phoenix
> anyway through the vendor channels.
>
>
Thanks Enis, really appreciate the info.



>
> >> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 5:00 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Due to some API changes in HBase, we need to have a separate branch
> for
> >> our
> >> > HBase 1.1 compatible branches. I've created a 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch for
> >> this
> >> > - please make sure to keep this branch in sync with the other 4.x and
> >> > master branches. We can release 4.x-HBase-1.2 compatible releases out
> of
> >> > master for 4.8. I think post 4.8 release we may not need to continue
> >> with
> >> > the 4.x-HBase-1.0 branch.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > James
> >>
> >
>