[DISCUSS] Next Release?

[Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org>]

So, I saw Mike updating some JIRA issues for fix releases - not sure if
that was some work to prep for a new release?  It's been about 3 months
since our last one, with several significant changes - are we ready to push
out 0.9.14-incubating, here, soon?

When we talked a while back we were targeting the X.org driver and RADIUS
support for 0.9.14-incubating.  I'm not sure what the status of the X.org
driver is, and I know the RADIUS extension has a little bit more work to do
on it before it's ready.

Thoughts?

-Nick

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>]

Agree with Mike. A last 0.9.14-incubating makes sense.

Regards
JB

On 10/23/2017 08:06 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org> wrote:
>> So, I saw Mike updating some JIRA issues for fix releases - not sure if
>> that was some work to prep for a new release?  It's been about 3 months
>> since our last one, with several significant changes - are we ready to push
>> out 0.9.14-incubating, here, soon?
>>
> 
> I would be in favor of finalizing scope for 0.9.14-incubating. There's
> quite a few changes ready, and several others waiting only on review
> or documentation:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Guacamole%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.14-incubating
> 
>> When we talked a while back we were targeting the X.org driver and RADIUS
>> support for 0.9.14-incubating.  I'm not sure what the status of the X.org
>> driver is, and I know the RADIUS extension has a little bit more work to do
>> on it before it's ready.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> 
> I definitely don't think I'll have the X.Org driver ready for merge by
> 0.9.14, so I've removed the version tag from the JIRA issue.
> 
> I'm would be on the fence regarding whether RADIUS should be part of
> 0.9.14. It's definitely nearing readiness, so I wouldn't be against
> including it within scope (particularly since it's been waiting for a
> while), but I also see benefit in restricting 0.9.14 to things which
> have already been merged or are directly tied to code which has
> already been merged.
> 
> Either way, yes, let's set scope.
> 
> - Mike
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

[Mike Jumper <mi...@guac-dev.org>]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org> wrote:
> So, I saw Mike updating some JIRA issues for fix releases - not sure if
> that was some work to prep for a new release?  It's been about 3 months
> since our last one, with several significant changes - are we ready to push
> out 0.9.14-incubating, here, soon?
>

I would be in favor of finalizing scope for 0.9.14-incubating. There's
quite a few changes ready, and several others waiting only on review
or documentation:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Guacamole%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.14-incubating

> When we talked a while back we were targeting the X.org driver and RADIUS
> support for 0.9.14-incubating.  I'm not sure what the status of the X.org
> driver is, and I know the RADIUS extension has a little bit more work to do
> on it before it's ready.
>
> Thoughts?
>

I definitely don't think I'll have the X.Org driver ready for merge by
0.9.14, so I've removed the version tag from the JIRA issue.

I'm would be on the fence regarding whether RADIUS should be part of
0.9.14. It's definitely nearing readiness, so I wouldn't be against
including it within scope (particularly since it's been waiting for a
while), but I also see benefit in restricting 0.9.14 to things which
have already been merged or are directly tied to code which has
already been merged.

Either way, yes, let's set scope.

- Mike