Re: [PR] [SOLR-17822] Document non-exploitability of CVE-2025-48924 [solr-site]

["vlsi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

vlsi commented on PR #152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-site/pull/152#issuecomment-3467339929

   Could you please add a test for the change?
   
   In other words, you suggest adding a VEX file that says "solr is currently not affected by not_affected".
   However, what if someone later adds `ClassUtils` usage into Solr code? Then the VEX file would be a false claim.
   
   Correct me if I am wrong, but adding such a VEX would require manual review on every release (==one would have to review the full code including the transitive dependencies and reflection to prove `ClassUtils` can't be called).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org