You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openwhisk.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/04/19 14:09:59 UTC

[GitHub] [openwhisk] qi0523 opened a new issue, #5216: ContainerManager.scala

qi0523 opened a new issue, #5216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5216

   <!--
   We use the issue tracker for bugs and feature requests. For general questions and discussion please use https://openwhisk.apache.org/slack.html or https://openwhisk.apache.org/community.html instead.
   
   Do NOT share passwords, credentials or other confidential information.
   
   Before creating a new issue, please check if there is one already open that
   fits the defect you are reporting.
   If you open an issue and realize later it is a duplicate of a pre-existing
   open issue, please close yours and add a comment to the other.
   
   Issues can be created for either defects or enhancement requests. If you are a committer than please add the labels "bug" or "feature". If you are not a committer please make clear in the comments which one it is, so that committers can add these labels later.
   
   If you are reporting a defect, please edit the issue description to include the
   information shown below.
   
   If you are reporting an enhancement request, please include information on what you are trying to achieve and why that enhancement would help you.
   
   For more information about reporting issues, see
   https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#raising-issues
   
   Use the commands below to provide key information from your environment:
   You do not have to include this information if this is a feature request.
   -->
   
   ## Environment details:
   
   * local deployment, native ubuntu, Mac OS, Kubernetes, ...
   * version of docker, ubuntu, ...
   
   ## Steps to reproduce the issue:
   
   1.   problem
   2.   
   3.   
   
   
   ## Provide the expected results and outputs:
   
   ```
   output comes here
   ```
   
   
   ## Provide the actual results and outputs:
   
   ```
   output comes here
   ```
   
   ## Additional information you deem important:
   * issue happens only occasionally or under certain circumstances   
   * changes you did or observed in the environment
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@openwhisk.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [openwhisk] qi0523 closed issue #5216: ContainerManager.scala

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
qi0523 closed issue #5216: ContainerManager.scala
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5216


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@openwhisk.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [openwhisk] ningyougang commented on issue #5216: ContainerManager.scala

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ningyougang commented on issue #5216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5216#issuecomment-1110737318

   Because, it would drop the nth element from the wholeInvokers, and return the new wholeInvokers which has dropped the nth element, so has no need to update.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@openwhisk.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [openwhisk] qi0523 commented on issue #5216: ContainerManager.scala

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
qi0523 commented on issue #5216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5216#issuecomment-1120540160

   The branch condition is (instance.id.userMemory.toMB - requiredMemory >= requiredMemory).
   I think that the else branch denotes the memory is not enough for next message rather than current message.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@openwhisk.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org