You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> on 2013/03/19 14:57:30 UTC
[VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
Regards,
-Rick
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Mamta Satoor <ms...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me too. I did adhoc testing along with buddy testing and the
release candidate behaved as expected/documented. The failure about
the triggers DERBY-5866 is an interesting one but I have not been able
to reproduce it after repeated runs. I have put in some extra
debugging info in it which hopefully will help to debug the problem if
the test fails again.
Thanks Rick for volunteering to be the release manager.
Mamta
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 3/19/2013 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
>> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>>
>> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>>
>> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>>
> my vote: +1
>
> I have spent the extra week looking at regression test failures against
> 10.10 and trunk and am now satisfied that 10.10 can go out. While we are
> not at 0 failures on nightly testing, we are now I think as good
> as we have been. I especially thank Knut for his help with DERBY-6092.
>
> I also reviewed the 50 or so bugs reported just against 10.10 and trunk
> for stopper regressions, and after the bug resolutions this week I
> no longer consider what is left enough to stop the release.
>
> I do believe the
> top of the 10.10 branch is now better than the release candidate, but
> I am ok with releasing this candidate, and hopefully delivering a follow
> on 10.10 release later this year.
>
> Thanks rick for putting the release together, and for extending the
> vote for extra testing.
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 3/19/2013 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
my vote: +1
I have spent the extra week looking at regression test failures against
10.10 and trunk and am now satisfied that 10.10 can go out. While we
are not at 0 failures on nightly testing, we are now I think as good
as we have been. I especially thank Knut for his help with DERBY-6092.
I also reviewed the 50 or so bugs reported just against 10.10 and trunk
for stopper regressions, and after the bug resolutions this week I
no longer consider what is left enough to stop the release.
I do believe the
top of the 10.10 branch is now better than the release candidate, but
I am ok with releasing this candidate, and hopefully delivering a follow
on 10.10 release later this year.
Thanks rick for putting the release together, and for extending the
vote for extra testing.
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
The polls will remain open for another week so that we can continue
analyzing test results. I will continue counting votes through 5:00 pm
San Francisco time on Monday April 15. Thanks for everyone's help in
testing this release candidate.
-Rick
On 3/19/13 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 3/19/2013 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
+1
I did some initial testing on z/OS and have done some function
compatibility testing (still incomplete) but have so far only found room
for better documentation and release notes and no serious code issues to
be addressed in 10.10. I feel more comfortable that the root causes of
the regression test failures have been identified and that there is a
fix waiting in the branch for DERBY-6092. I don't think we need to
reroll the release for that.
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
The platform test results for 10.10.1 look better to me than the
corresponding results for 10.9.1 and 10.8.1. I would not hold up this
release because of the unresolved checklist items here:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTenOneChecklist
+1
On 3/19/13 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <kn...@oracle.com>.
Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> writes:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
My vote: +1
The results from the platform testing look good:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTenOnePlatformTesting
My manual testing of the release candidate has not revealed any
problems, and I think 10.10.1.1 is a good improvement over the previous
releases.
Thanks,
--
Knut Anders
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Kim Haase <ca...@oracle.com>.
+1
I checked the docs for both the db-derby-10.10.1.1-bin.tar.gz and
db-derby-10.10.1.1-bin.zip bundles, and they appear to be correct and
complete.
Kim
On 3/19/2013 9:57 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release.
+1 to this release; thanks all for the hard work!
I share the community's concern with DERBY-6092; however I
think that JDK 1.5 is quite old now, and users who might
encounter DERBY-6092 can find several workarounds, and can
also simply grab the fix from the 10.10 branch.
It's also fine with me if we wait to pick up that fix and
create a new release.
So I'm +1 either way :)
thanks,
bryan
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
+1 My testing has not popped up any very scary regressions, and I think
this version has some valuable fixes and new functionality.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to accept
> it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~**rhillegas/10.10.1.1/<http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/>
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-**derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease<http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease>
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by pif <fr...@gmail.com>.
I've also a question about testing
In the recent test reports there ist no JDK8 included, also the 10.10
release support this
Any ideas or clarification, why this release is not testes autmaticly with
JDK8?
http://download.java.net/javadesktop/derby/javadb-5574202-report/
--
View this message in context: http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/VOTE-10-10-1-1-release-tp128222p128265.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 3/20/2013 5:09 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Hi Dag,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, hopefully people will find the
> cycles to finish buddy testing.
>
> Thanks,
I have started but not completed my buddy testing and will move it over
to the RC instead of my sandbox. We used to always do buddy testing on
the RC but ended up with too many RC's. There are definite advantages
though to using the actual doc and bits so I think if others are still
buddy testing it would be good to move over to the RC.
Best
Kathey
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
On 3/19/13 7:49 PM, Dag Wanvik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks, Rick. See inlined question.
>
> On 19.03.2013 23:57, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
>> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>>
>> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
> There are still three unfinished buddy testing items in
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease. Is this a cause
> for concern?
Hi Dag,
Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, hopefully people will find the cycles
to finish buddy testing.
Thanks,
-Rick
> Thanks,
> Dag
>
>> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Dag Wanvik <da...@oracle.com>.
Hi,
thanks, Rick. See inlined question.
On 19.03.2013 23:57, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
There are still three unfinished buddy testing items in
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease. Is this a cause
for concern?
Thanks,
Dag
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Dag Wanvik <da...@oracle.com>.
On 08.04.2013 23:29, Dag Wanvik wrote:
> +0.9
Hmm I guess for a formal vote I shouldn't use fractional yes/nos.... so
I'll change that to +1.
I'd sleep better if we knew the root cause of DERBY-6092, but on
balance, the release is good improvement
and it would be good to get it in user hands. We must expect an update
release anyway.
Thanks,
Dag
>
> I think this release is up to par for the course. I'd like to see the
> root cause of the increased frequency of DERBY-6092, though.
> ("testPositionAgressive(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbcapi.BlobClob4BlobTest)j
> fails with : 'The handle is invalid.: java.io.IOException'. )
>
> Thanks,
> Dag
>
> On 19.03.2013 23:57, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
>> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>>
>> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>>
>> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
Re: [VOTE] 10.10.1.1 release
Posted by Dag Wanvik <da...@oracle.com>.
+0.9
I think this release is up to par for the course. I'd like to see the
root cause of the increased frequency of DERBY-6092, though.
("testPositionAgressive(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbcapi.BlobClob4BlobTest)j
fails with : 'The handle is invalid.: java.io.IOException'. )
Thanks,
Dag
On 19.03.2013 23:57, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Please test-drive the 10.10.1.1 candidate, then vote on whether to
> accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.10.1.1/
>
> The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, April 8.
>
> 10.10.1.1 is a feature release, described in greater detail here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTenOneRelease
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>