CMS and NMS failover

[Richard Gillingham <ri...@richardgillingham.com>]

Hi all

I'm working on a project using ActiveMQ with Delphi and C# clients.  For
Delphi support I'm using some wrapper classes exported out of a custom VC++
DLL using CMS.

My question is:

For each of NMS and CMS where is client failover support on their respective
roadmaps??  Has anyone implemented any strategies in their own projects?

One concern for example is a connection fails the child Sessions will be
freed along with their consumer,producers.  Once a new connection is
established the graph of producer/consumers will have to be rebuilt.  This
is something I'd have expected to be covered in the product implementation.

Kind regards

Richard
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CMS-and-NMS-failover-tp17700734s2354p17700734.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CMS and NMS failover

[Jim Gomes <e....@gmail.com>]

Speaking for NMS, we have the failover support scheduled for version
1.1.  We are currently getting ready to release 1.0.  Top of the list
after that is failover.  As Nathan said, all patches and offers of
help (testing, documentation, reviews, etc.) are appreciated.

-Jim



On 6/6/08, Mittler, Nathan <na...@sensis.com> wrote:
> Speaking for ActiveMQ-CPP (CMS), we do have an issue for this:
> http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-100
>
> However, nobody's really had the time to get around to the
> implementation.  If someone would like to step up, we'd be happy to take
> patches.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Gillingham [mailto:richard@richardgillingham.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:40 PM
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: CMS and NMS failover
>>
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm working on a project using ActiveMQ with Delphi and C# clients.
> For
>> Delphi support I'm using some wrapper classes exported out of a custom
>> VC++
>> DLL using CMS.
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> For each of NMS and CMS where is client failover support on their
>> respective
>> roadmaps??  Has anyone implemented any strategies in their own
> projects?
>>
>> One concern for example is a connection fails the child Sessions will
> be
>> freed along with their consumer,producers.  Once a new connection is
>> established the graph of producer/consumers will have to be rebuilt.
> This
>> is something I'd have expected to be covered in the product
>> implementation.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Richard
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/CMS-and-NMS-failover-
>> tp17700734s2354p17700734.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

RE: CMS and NMS failover

["Mittler, Nathan" <na...@sensis.com>]

Speaking for ActiveMQ-CPP (CMS), we do have an issue for this:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-100

However, nobody's really had the time to get around to the
implementation.  If someone would like to step up, we'd be happy to take
patches.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Gillingham [mailto:richard@richardgillingham.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:40 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: CMS and NMS failover
> 
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I'm working on a project using ActiveMQ with Delphi and C# clients.
For
> Delphi support I'm using some wrapper classes exported out of a custom
> VC++
> DLL using CMS.
> 
> My question is:
> 
> For each of NMS and CMS where is client failover support on their
> respective
> roadmaps??  Has anyone implemented any strategies in their own
projects?
> 
> One concern for example is a connection fails the child Sessions will
be
> freed along with their consumer,producers.  Once a new connection is
> established the graph of producer/consumers will have to be rebuilt.
This
> is something I'd have expected to be covered in the product
> implementation.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Richard
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CMS-and-NMS-failover-
> tp17700734s2354p17700734.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.