You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@metron.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/01 14:25:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-1464) Convert schemas to be compatible
with Solr 5.5.2
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16382051#comment-16382051 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-1464:
----------------------------------------
Github user simonellistonball commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/945
Are we losing anything by moving the scheme from Range to Trie types?, repeating my comment on
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/922:
Given that our use case is heavily dependant on sorting, I wonder why not the Trie based indices for numeric fields. I may be completely wrong on their advantages but would love to hear the logic behind the choice of Point indices.
If there is a good reason, maybe we should consider retaining those for 6.6 in addition to the 5.5 clusters. Either way it would be be good to understand the basis for the type decision.
> Convert schemas to be compatible with Solr 5.5.2
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: METRON-1464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1464
> Project: Metron
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ryan Merriman
> Assignee: Ryan Merriman
> Priority: Major
>
> It would be ideal if our Solr schemas were compatible with Solr 5.5.2 or 6.6.2. This would be users the option of using a manually installed Solr or HDP Search.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)