Inaccuracies on http://geronimo.apache.org webpage

[Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>]

Hey all,

I was poking around on the main page and stumble on this: "Our most popular
distribution is a fully certified J2EE 1.4 application server runtime. We
are working on our next version of the server which is based on Java EE 5."
I'd hate for people to show up and say "I was going to use geronimo but it's
looks like they're not even certified on J2EE 5!"

~Jason Warner

Re: Inaccuracies on http://geronimo.apache.org webpage

[Prasad Kashyap <go...@gmail.com>]

Good catch. I have updated this. Let's wait for the wheels to turn and
the page to be federated.

Cheers
Prasad

On 10/31/07, Erik B. Craig <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> Right you are... Yeah... I agree with Jason, this should /probably/ get
> updated a bit =P.
>
> Jason Warner wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I was poking around on the main page and stumble on this: "Our most
> > popular distribution is a fully certified J2EE 1.4 application server
> > runtime. We are working on our next version of the server which is
> > based on Java EE 5."  I'd hate for people to show up and say "I was
> > going to use geronimo but it's looks like they're not even certified
> > on J2EE 5!"
> >
> > ~Jason Warner
>

Re: Inaccuracies on http://geronimo.apache.org webpage

["Erik B. Craig" <gi...@gmail.com>]

Hmmm,

Right you are... Yeah... I agree with Jason, this should /probably/ get 
updated a bit =P.

Jason Warner wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was poking around on the main page and stumble on this: "Our most 
> popular distribution is a fully certified J2EE 1.4 application server 
> runtime. We are working on our next version of the server which is 
> based on Java EE 5."  I'd hate for people to show up and say "I was 
> going to use geronimo but it's looks like they're not even certified 
> on J2EE 5!"
>
> ~Jason Warner