You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Benoit Tellier (Jira)" <se...@james.apache.org> on 2019/10/04 05:11:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-2900) Use UnicastProcessor instead of
WorkQueueProcessor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16944219#comment-16944219 ]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-2900:
---------------------------------------
https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/2728 contributed this and is merged
> Use UnicastProcessor instead of WorkQueueProcessor
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-2900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2900
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Gautier DI FOLCO
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Since Reactor 3.3.0 (see JAMES-2899), WorkQueueProcessor have been moved out of reactor-core.
> It'll be better to avoid an extra dependency.
> Additionally we used it to represents "many producers, one consumer" which is the role of UnicastProcessor.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org