You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to current-testers@httpd.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2005/03/16 22:00:47 UTC
2.1.4 available for testing
Hi all,
There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report back with any problems.
Thanks for testing!
Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:37:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts
> between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is
> currently addressing this.
Would you be against re-rolling 2.1.4 with an updated apr-iconv that uses the
APR_ICONV1_PATH environment variable instead and calling that 2.1.4 tarball
beta? My understanding is that this change is done entirely within APR-iconv
and does not have any direct effect on httpd. Therefore, the httpd code
is identical and unchanged: only the dependency is updated.
I'm reluctant to waste yet another release because a dependency has bugs that
have nothing whatsoever to do with httpd. I also still feel that these are
issues that would be safe to resolve during the beta process. -- justin
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts
between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is
currently addressing this.
As far as alpha, my recent commit to pcre raises a concern that
may or may not apply to httpd. The byteflip function did some
quick extention and trunction between 16 and 32 bit quantities
that don't concern me much.
But byteflip's other side effect was to sign-extend the result
into meaningless gunk, as right shift signed is allowed to
carry the negation bit. This function is only used for pre
compiled regular expression structures. I'm not certain we
even have such entities. It is only tripped when the regex
was compiled on big/little endian platform and processed on
a little/big endian (converse) platform.
So it's clearly broken in this edge case, but I'm not certain
that httpd is affected. Anyone with cycles to research?
In other news, the other few compile emits are cleaned up,
and everything is clear for the next candidate.
Bill
At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please report back with any problems.
>
>Thanks for testing!
>
>
>Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts
between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is
currently addressing this.
As far as alpha, my recent commit to pcre raises a concern that
may or may not apply to httpd. The byteflip function did some
quick extention and trunction between 16 and 32 bit quantities
that don't concern me much.
But byteflip's other side effect was to sign-extend the result
into meaningless gunk, as right shift signed is allowed to
carry the negation bit. This function is only used for pre
compiled regular expression structures. I'm not certain we
even have such entities. It is only tripped when the regex
was compiled on big/little endian platform and processed on
a little/big endian (converse) platform.
So it's clearly broken in this edge case, but I'm not certain
that httpd is affected. Anyone with cycles to research?
In other news, the other few compile emits are cleaned up,
and everything is clear for the next candidate.
Bill
At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please report back with any problems.
>
>Thanks for testing!
>
>
>Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 (RHEL3 RPMs)
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
FWIW: +1
Tested on:
Linux (Ubuntu - Warty Warthog)
Win32 (XP SP2)*
Sander
*) Source from the tag, no zip ball is available at this time.
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:00 PM +0100 Sander Striker
<st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
+1 for beta on Darwin (modulo httpd-test issues from last time).
Thanks! -- justin
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
+/- 0 for alpha based on apr-iconv 1.1.0
Revisiting issues for apr-iconv 1.1.1 - if that's our prerequisite,
then I'm likely to lean +1.
At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please report back with any problems.
>
>Thanks for testing!
>
>
>Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
+/- 0 for alpha based on apr-iconv 1.1.0
Revisiting issues for apr-iconv 1.1.1 - if that's our prerequisite,
then I'm likely to lean +1.
At 03:00 PM 3/16/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please report back with any problems.
>
>Thanks for testing!
>
>
>Sander
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Paul Querna wrote:
> Oden Eriksson wrote:
>
>> onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>>>
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>
>>> Please report back with any problems.
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing!
>>>
>>>
>>> Sander
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmm..., I get:
>>
>> Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241 of
>> /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot load
>> /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into server:
>> /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
>> util_ldap_cache_getuserdn
>>
>> This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586)
>>
>
> Change the load order in your httpd.conf.
> move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap.
>
For reference, this is also PR 33568
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33568
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 03:39 AM 3/22/2005, Graham Leggett wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
>
>> It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the
>> mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail
>> to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would
>> accept them loaded in either order.
>
>Is this easy to do?
I'd think so. See modules/test/
mod_optional_fn_export.c
mod_optional_fn_export.h
mod_optional_fn_import.c
Optional functions are for many:one implementations
mod_optional_hook_export.c
mod_optional_hook_export.h
mod_optional_hook_import.c
Optional hooks are for many:many implementations, where you want
multiple backends.
These calls seem to be fn's not hooks.
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
> It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the
> mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail
> to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would
> accept them loaded in either order.
Is this easy to do?
/me has yet to learn about optional functions.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 06:44 AM 3/20/2005, Graham Leggett wrote:
>Oden Eriksson wrote:
>
>>Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past?
>
>The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes (as I understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one module depends on another module, for example in this case where mod_authnz_ldap depends on mod_ldap.
It would be nice if before 2.2 we got around to changing the
mod_ldap api to register optional functions. It will still fail
to start if the user didn't load mod_ldap, but at least we would
accept them loaded in either order.
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Oden Eriksson wrote:
> Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past?
The order of modules is no longer important for configuration purposes
(as I understand), but it is important for practical reasons when one
module depends on another module, for example in this case where
mod_authnz_ldap depends on mod_ldap.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Oden Eriksson <oe...@mandrakesoft.com>.
torsdag 17 mars 2005 06.52 skrev Paul Querna:
> Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
> >>
> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>
> >>Please report back with any problems.
> >>
> >>Thanks for testing!
> >>
> >>
> >>Sander
> >
> > Hmm..., I get:
> >
> > Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241
> > of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot
> > load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into
> > server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
> > util_ldap_cache_getuserdn
> >
> > This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586)
>
> Change the load order in your httpd.conf.
> move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap.
Ahh! I thought that loading order was something from the past?
Well, it works now. Will try some more after I have gotten some sleep...
Thanks Paul.
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Oden Eriksson wrote:
> onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>>Please report back with any problems.
>>
>>Thanks for testing!
>>
>>
>>Sander
>
>
> Hmm..., I get:
>
> Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241
> of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot
> load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into
> server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
> util_ldap_cache_getuserdn
>
> This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586)
>
Change the load order in your httpd.conf.
move the LoadModule for mod_ldap to before mod_authnz_ldap.
-Paul
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Oden Eriksson <oe...@mandrakesoft.com>.
onsdag 16 mars 2005 22.00 skrev Sander Striker:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
>
> Sander
Hmm..., I get:
Starting httpd21: httpd21: Syntax error on line 241
of /etc/httpd21/conf/httpd21.conf: Cannot
load /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so into
server: /usr/lib64/apache21/mod_authnz_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
util_ldap_cache_getuserdn
This happens on Mandrakelinux 10.1 (x86_64) and Mandrakelinux 10.2 (i586)
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
+1, Fedora Core 3.
-Paul
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
+1, Fedora Core 3.
-Paul
Re: 2.1.4 available for testing
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are some 2.1.4-alpha tarballs waiting to be tested at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please report back with any problems.
>
> Thanks for testing!
FWIW: +1
Tested on:
Linux (Ubuntu - Warty Warthog)
Win32 (XP SP2)*
Sander
*) Source from the tag, no zip ball is available at this time.