[BETWIXT][patch] SAXBeanWriter

[Jakob Praher <jp...@yahoo.de>]

** this is just a resend, since I got no response, perhaps adding 
the project in the subject will help .. **

hi all,


I am using SAXBeanWriter in a Cocoon Environment.
for this I had to patch the SAXBeanWriter to do the following:

I)

startElement( "", qname, qname , atts ) instead of
startElement( "", "", qname, atts ) 

-> the same for endElement

this behaviour is the "default", looked in examples and books for sax
nodes that have no namespace.
plus the SAXTransformer used in cocoon doesn't accept the original style
(simple didn't display it )

II)

optionalized the calls to startDocument( ) endDocument( ), which are
called in start(), end( ).

add a constructor element, the default behaviour is backward
compatiblity.

reason: frequently, in generators, you don't have control over the whole
document ( this violates xml ioc ;-) )

attached you find a patch against CVS 1.6 version.

thanks

-- Jakob

Re: [BETWIXT][patch] SAXBeanWriter

[robert burrell donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>]

hi jacob

i think my reply and your reposted crossed in transit. if you missed it (i 
changed the subject) it's in the archives:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=104516486803306&w=2

- robert

On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 07:34 PM, Jakob Praher wrote:

> ** this is just a resend, since I got no response, perhaps adding
> the project in the subject will help .. **
>
> hi all,
>
>
> I am using SAXBeanWriter in a Cocoon Environment.
> for this I had to patch the SAXBeanWriter to do the following:
>
> I)
>
> startElement( "", qname, qname , atts ) instead of
> startElement( "", "", qname, atts )
>
> -> the same for endElement
>
> this behaviour is the "default", looked in examples and books for sax
> nodes that have no namespace.
> plus the SAXTransformer used in cocoon doesn't accept the original style
> (simple didn't display it )
>
> II)
>
> optionalized the calls to startDocument( ) endDocument( ), which are
> called in start(), end( ).
>
> add a constructor element, the default behaviour is backward
> compatiblity.
>
> reason: frequently, in generators, you don't have control over the whole
> document ( this violates xml ioc ;-) )
>
> attached you find a patch against CVS 1.6 version.
>
> thanks
>
> -- Jakob
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org