You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Yi Liu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/06 03:32:04 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HDFS-8862) Improve
BlockManager#excessReplicateMap
Yi Liu created HDFS-8862:
----------------------------
Summary: Improve BlockManager#excessReplicateMap
Key: HDFS-8862
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8862
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: namenode
Reporter: Yi Liu
Assignee: Yi Liu
Per [~cmccabe]'s comments in HDFS-8792, this JIRA is to discuss improving {{BlockManager#excessReplicateMap}}.
That's right HashMap don't ever shrink when elements are removed, but TreeMap entry needs to store more (memory) references (left, right, parent) than HashMap entry (only one reference next), even when there is element removing and cause some entry empty, the empty HashMap entry is just a {{null}} reference (4 bytes), so they are close at this point. On the other hand, the key of {{excessReplicateMap}} is datanode uuid, so the entries number is almost fixed, so HashMap memory is good than TreeMap memory in this case. I think the most important is the search/insert/remove performance, HashMap is absolutely better than TreeMap. Because we don't need to sort, we should use HashMap instead of TreeMap
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)