You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by Ben Mahler <be...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/11 03:14:22 UTC
Re: Review Request 15114: Small cleanups of the Master code.
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, line 1552
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/diff/2/?file=375378#file375378line1552>
> >
> > Why did you pull this out when it's used only once?
This will be used by the Registrar integration and I wanted to minimize the amount of diff for that change since it's very critical code.
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, line 2772
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/diff/2/?file=375378#file375378line2772>
> >
> > How is slave->executors.contains(frameworkId) not possible? Didn't you just get the key above?
You're right, this becomes relevant only in a subsequent patch, so I'll remove it here.
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, line 1386
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/diff/2/?file=375378#file375378line1386>
> >
> > if (slave == NULL) {
> > LOG...
> > return;
> > }
We don't return in the NULL case.
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, lines 1189-1196
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/diff/2/?file=375378#file375378line1189>
> >
> > Can you use protobuf::createStatusUpdate()?
If the slaveId was an Option in createStatusUpdate then I could. :)
- Ben
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/#review28427
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 1, 2013, 6:17 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Nov. 1, 2013, 6:17 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
>
>
> Repository: mesos-git
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This is to minimize the size of the diff I end up sending for the stateful master implementation. There should be no functional change here.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/master/master.hpp e377af8b3ccd932ae411fa2df4c19642a7310d02
> src/master/master.cpp 8e14a070e87ebe579b54d05fb1e8b286edb5e459
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15114/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben Mahler
>
>