You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/12/02 11:42:10 UTC
[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-837) cyclic dependency ClientCnxn,
ZooKeeper
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966054#action_12966054 ]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-837:
-------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12465125/ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
against trunk revision 1040752.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
-1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 8 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/60//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/60//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/60//console
This message is automatically generated.
> cyclic dependency ClientCnxn, ZooKeeper
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 3.3.1
> Reporter: Patrick Datko
> Assignee: Thomas Koch
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
>
>
> ZooKeeper instantiates ClientCnxn in its ctor with this and therefor builds a
> cyclic dependency graph between both objects. This means, you can't have the
> one without the other. So why did you bother do make them to separate classes
> in the first place?
> ClientCnxn accesses ZooKeeper.state. State should rather be a property of
> ClientCnxn. And ClientCnxn accesses zooKeeper.get???Watches() in its method
> primeConnection(). I've not yet checked, how this dependency should be
> resolved better.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.