You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to repository@apache.org by Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com> on 2003/11/07 20:58:18 UTC

Road Map

Lets agree on some first steps to take

We need to

   1. Agree on Repository goals
   2. Agree on Repository requirements
   3. Agree on URI syntax
   4. Recommend  best practices for
         1. Client Tools
         1. Management Tools

Then we can encourge / sponsor  projects that write code.

This assumes that this list is not about a particular code base, but 
about the Structure  of a Apache Repository, a set of specification.
I very much think that the steps must be done in order. 
If you agree please review and update the wiki so we can move forward.

Otherwise we will go in circles.


R,
Nick

Re: Road Map

Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
[...iterating over it...]

As already suggested by Nick, perhaps the best start would be
to come up with a simple resolution about this lists's mission,
e.g. something like the rationale and scope sections of
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal
(of course not in a technical sense just as an outline of a
useful description) or even like a simple form of
http://incubator.apache.org/resolution.html.

This would at least ensure that there is a set of common and
all-agreed goals and/or requirements. Posted on a web-site
this would also help to get other projects / new-comers on
board...

just my 0.02 €

Cheers,
Erik

On 07.11.2003, at 20:58, Nick Chalko wrote:

> Lets agree on some first steps to take
>
> We need to
>
>   1. Agree on Repository goals
>   2. Agree on Repository requirements
>   3. Agree on URI syntax
>   4. Recommend  best practices for
>         1. Client Tools
>         1. Management Tools
>
> Then we can encourge / sponsor  projects that write code.
>
> This assumes that this list is not about a particular code base, but 
> about the Structure  of a Apache Repository, a set of specification.
> I very much think that the steps must be done in order. If you agree 
> please review and update the wiki so we can move forward.
>
> Otherwise we will go in circles.
>
>
> R,
> Nick


Re: Road Map

Posted by Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com>.
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:

Start at, and hack away.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository

>Nick, what's the wiki link?
>--
>dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
>Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
>
>
>Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com> wrote on 08/11/2003 06:58:18 AM:
>
>  
>
>>Lets agree on some first steps to take
>>
>>We need to
>>
>>   1. Agree on Repository goals
>>   2. Agree on Repository requirements
>>   3. Agree on URI syntax
>>   4. Recommend  best practices for
>>         1. Client Tools
>>         1. Management Tools
>>
>>Then we can encourge / sponsor  projects that write code.
>>
>>This assumes that this list is not about a particular code base, but 
>>about the Structure  of a Apache Repository, a set of specification.
>>I very much think that the steps must be done in order. 
>>If you agree please review and update the wiki so we can move forward.
>>
>>Otherwise we will go in circles.
>>
>>
>>R,
>>Nick
>>    
>>




Re: Road Map

Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Nick, what's the wiki link?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc


Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com> wrote on 08/11/2003 06:58:18 AM:

> Lets agree on some first steps to take
> 
> We need to
> 
>    1. Agree on Repository goals
>    2. Agree on Repository requirements
>    3. Agree on URI syntax
>    4. Recommend  best practices for
>          1. Client Tools
>          1. Management Tools
> 
> Then we can encourge / sponsor  projects that write code.
> 
> This assumes that this list is not about a particular code base, but 
> about the Structure  of a Apache Repository, a set of specification.
> I very much think that the steps must be done in order. 
> If you agree please review and update the wiki so we can move forward.
> 
> Otherwise we will go in circles.
> 
> 
> R,
> Nick