You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> on 2012/10/19 07:39:29 UTC
[DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and performance fixes.
Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
(HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
-- Lars
Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
Hmm... Probably not the best idea then.
I'll just bump the default to 1.0.4.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Here is some more background information from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6962 :
hadoop 1.1 release annoucement:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0eTo41c8GSb
The thinking behind new recommendation is that future patches for reducing
MTTR may depend on the improvement unique to hadoop 1.1 (absent from hadoop
1.0.4)
For reference, here is list of incompatible changes between hadoop 1.0 and
1.1:
HDFS-2617 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2617>. Replaced
Kerberized SSL for image transfer and fsck with
SPNEGO-based solution. (Jakob Homan, Owen O'Malley, Alejandro Abdelnur and
Aaron T. Myers via atm)
HDFS-3044 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3044>. fsck move
should be non-destructive by default.
(Colin Patrick McCabe via eli)
HADOOP-8230 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8230>. Enable
sync by default and disable append. (eli)
HADOOP-8365 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8365>. Provide
ability to disable working sync. (eli)
HADOOP-8552 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8552>. Conflict:
Same security.log.file for multiple users.
(kkambatl via tucu)
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Pardon my lack of knowledge, is 1.1 wire compatible with 1.0? If can
> just drop a 1.1 client on top of 1.0 (any 1.0), and it's tested, then
> I would be +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and
> performance fixes.
> > Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
> > (HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
Hmm... Probably not the best idea then.
I'll just bump the default to 1.0.4.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Here is some more background information from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6962 :
hadoop 1.1 release annoucement:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0eTo41c8GSb
The thinking behind new recommendation is that future patches for reducing
MTTR may depend on the improvement unique to hadoop 1.1 (absent from hadoop
1.0.4)
For reference, here is list of incompatible changes between hadoop 1.0 and
1.1:
HDFS-2617 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2617>. Replaced
Kerberized SSL for image transfer and fsck with
SPNEGO-based solution. (Jakob Homan, Owen O'Malley, Alejandro Abdelnur and
Aaron T. Myers via atm)
HDFS-3044 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3044>. fsck move
should be non-destructive by default.
(Colin Patrick McCabe via eli)
HADOOP-8230 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8230>. Enable
sync by default and disable append. (eli)
HADOOP-8365 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8365>. Provide
ability to disable working sync. (eli)
HADOOP-8552 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8552>. Conflict:
Same security.log.file for multiple users.
(kkambatl via tucu)
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Pardon my lack of knowledge, is 1.1 wire compatible with 1.0? If can
> just drop a 1.1 client on top of 1.0 (any 1.0), and it's tested, then
> I would be +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and
> performance fixes.
> > Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
> > (HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Here is some more background information from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6962 :
hadoop 1.1 release annoucement:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0eTo41c8GSb
The thinking behind new recommendation is that future patches for reducing
MTTR may depend on the improvement unique to hadoop 1.1 (absent from hadoop
1.0.4)
For reference, here is list of incompatible changes between hadoop 1.0 and
1.1:
HDFS-2617 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2617>. Replaced
Kerberized SSL for image transfer and fsck with
SPNEGO-based solution. (Jakob Homan, Owen O'Malley, Alejandro Abdelnur and
Aaron T. Myers via atm)
HDFS-3044 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3044>. fsck move
should be non-destructive by default.
(Colin Patrick McCabe via eli)
HADOOP-8230 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8230>. Enable
sync by default and disable append. (eli)
HADOOP-8365 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8365>. Provide
ability to disable working sync. (eli)
HADOOP-8552 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8552>. Conflict:
Same security.log.file for multiple users.
(kkambatl via tucu)
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Pardon my lack of knowledge, is 1.1 wire compatible with 1.0? If can
> just drop a 1.1 client on top of 1.0 (any 1.0), and it's tested, then
> I would be +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and
> performance fixes.
> > Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
> > (HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Here is some more background information from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6962 :
hadoop 1.1 release annoucement:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0eTo41c8GSb
The thinking behind new recommendation is that future patches for reducing
MTTR may depend on the improvement unique to hadoop 1.1 (absent from hadoop
1.0.4)
For reference, here is list of incompatible changes between hadoop 1.0 and
1.1:
HDFS-2617 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2617>. Replaced
Kerberized SSL for image transfer and fsck with
SPNEGO-based solution. (Jakob Homan, Owen O'Malley, Alejandro Abdelnur and
Aaron T. Myers via atm)
HDFS-3044 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3044>. fsck move
should be non-destructive by default.
(Colin Patrick McCabe via eli)
HADOOP-8230 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8230>. Enable
sync by default and disable append. (eli)
HADOOP-8365 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8365>. Provide
ability to disable working sync. (eli)
HADOOP-8552 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8552>. Conflict:
Same security.log.file for multiple users.
(kkambatl via tucu)
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Pardon my lack of knowledge, is 1.1 wire compatible with 1.0? If can
> just drop a 1.1 client on top of 1.0 (any 1.0), and it's tested, then
> I would be +1.
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and
> performance fixes.
> > Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
> > (HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Default to Hadoop 1.1 in HBase 0.94?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Pardon my lack of knowledge, is 1.1 wire compatible with 1.0? If can
just drop a 1.1 client on top of 1.0 (any 1.0), and it's tested, then
I would be +1.
J-D
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hadoop 1.1 was released and has some important correctness and performance fixes.
> Should we default HBase 0.94 to Hadoop 1.1?
> (HBase 0.96 was already switched... I think)
>
> -- Lars
>