You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Tim Noell <tn...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/02 21:42:52 UTC
CHANGES file typo, or what (for svn 1.4.2)
Hi svn users:
In the CHANGES file, under User-visible changes, Client, it says:
"* fixed: 'svn status -u' fails in a read-only working copy (r21904, -19)"
Note the issue ID is "-19". Is this a typo?
I'd like to understand the scenarios that this fix affects.
Can someone point me at the issue, and/or explain? (is this Issue# 2583?)
We use Linux RHEL3 and RHEL4, svn version 1.3.2, and are considering an upgrade.
Does version 1.4.2 no longer use .svn/tmp for storing temp files
during translations on svn st, svn diff? IOW,
does this fis the problem where when a user does an svn st on a
working copy owned by some other user,
and they get permission denited on .xvn/tmp/foo Can't open foo?
when permissions oare 750 on .svn/tmp?
Or is this some other scenario that was fixed?
Thx,
Tim Noell
--
// "Only dead fish go with the flow"
Re: CHANGES file typo, or what (for svn 1.4.2)
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
Tim Noell wrote:
> Hi svn users:
>
> In the CHANGES file, under User-visible changes, Client, it says:
>
> "* fixed: 'svn status -u' fails in a read-only working copy (r21904, -19)"
>
> Note the issue ID is "-19". Is this a typo?
No, it means r21904 with 04 replaced with 19, so you don't have to write
21919.
> I'd like to understand the scenarios that this fix affects.
>
>
> Can someone point me at the issue, and/or explain? (is this Issue# 2583?)
>
> We use Linux RHEL3 and RHEL4, svn version 1.3.2, and are considering an upgrade.
>
> Does version 1.4.2 no longer use .svn/tmp for storing temp files during translations on svn st, svn diff? IOW,
>
> does this fis the problem where when a user does an svn st on a working copy owned by some other user,
> and they get permission denited on .xvn/tmp/foo Can't open foo?
> when permissions oare 750 on .svn/tmp?
>
>
> Or is this some other scenario that was fixed?
Well, it's not totally clear without reviewing the diffs, but here's the
log messages:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r21904 | dionisos | 2006-10-12 11:11:08 -0700 (Thu, 12 Oct 2006) | 8 lines
Stop requiring write access to the working copy when running status -u.
* subversion/libsvn_client/status.c
(svn_client_status2): Don't necessarily use the adm dir for
temporary files (in the case of ra_dav: the file to spool the
server response into).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r21919 | dionisos | 2006-10-13 15:00:22 -0700 (Fri, 13 Oct 2006) | 15 lines
Respect the fact that the working copy was to be used read only.
* subversion/libsvn_client/client.h
(struct svn_client__callback_baton_t.read_only_wc): New. Signals whether
we should treat the working copy as writeable or not.
* subversion/libsvn_client/ra.c
(svn_client__open_ra_session_internal): Initialize the new
callback baton field.
(open_tmp_file): Only open a file in the working copy root
iff the working copy is to be treated writeable. Fall back to
a temp dir otherwise.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<bl...@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org