You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2016/11/01 12:05:19 UTC
Re: JSON license again
IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
and has no place as CatA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: JSON license again
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Done.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Yep.
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Felix
> >
> >> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
> >> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
> >>
> >>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
> >>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
> >>> and has no place as CatA.
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
Re: JSON license again
Posted by Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>.
This change in policy made the news!
"7 notable legal developments in open source in 2016"
https://opensource.com/article/17/1/yearbook-7-notable-legal-developments-2016
Jim Jagielski wrote on 11/3/16 11:20 AM:
> Yep.
>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does that read \u201eit is CatX\u201c ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Felix
>>
>>> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
>>> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
>>>
>>>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
>>>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
>>>> and has no place as CatA.
--
- Shane
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: JSON license again
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Yep.
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
>
> Thanks
> Felix
>
>> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>:
>>
>> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
>> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
>>
>>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
>>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
>>> and has no place as CatA.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: JSON license again
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>.
Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
Thanks
Felix
> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>:
>
> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
>
>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
>> and has no place as CatA.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
Re: JSON license again
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
> and has no place as CatA.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org