You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sentry.apache.org by Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com> on 2017/05/24 16:55:19 UTC
[DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking about two releases.
1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be useful to release those as 1.8 release.
2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving this work into 2.0 release.
Any thoughts on this?
- Alex
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <kk...@cloudera.com>.
I would like to volunteer
-Kalyan
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Does anyone want to volunteer to lead or help with the release?
>
> - Alex
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Na Li <li...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > + agree
> >
> > Lina
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> > kkalyan@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 I agree.
> > >
> > > -Kalyan
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> > coheigea@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 - makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > Colm.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <
> sergio.pena@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sounds interesting Sasha.
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and
> there
> > > are
> > > > > currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a
> > > release
> > > > > for Sentry.
> > > > >
> > > > > About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
> > > > > release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is
> > > bringing.
> > > > > The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
> > > > > (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start
> the
> > > > > support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more
> > fine-granularity
> > > > > permissions including column masking and row filtering.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to
> Sentry
> > > and
> > > > do
> > > > > it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Sergio
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> > > akolb@cloudera.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new
> Sentry
> > > > > > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking
> > > about
> > > > > two
> > > > > > releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would
> be
> > > > useful
> > > > > > to release those as 1.8 release.
> > > > > > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it
> introduces
> > > > > > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering
> > moving
> > > > this
> > > > > > work into 2.0 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts on this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Alex
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > > >
> > > > Talend Community Coder
> > > > http://coders.talend.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com>.
Does anyone want to volunteer to lead or help with the release?
- Alex
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Na Li <li...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> + agree
>
> Lina
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
> kkalyan@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 I agree.
> >
> > -Kalyan
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> coheigea@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 - makes sense.
> > >
> > > Colm.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <sergio.pena@cloudera.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds interesting Sasha.
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there
> > are
> > > > currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a
> > release
> > > > for Sentry.
> > > >
> > > > About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
> > > > release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is
> > bringing.
> > > > The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
> > > > (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the
> > > > support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more
> fine-granularity
> > > > permissions including column masking and row filtering.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry
> > and
> > > do
> > > > it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
> > > >
> > > > - Sergio
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> > akolb@cloudera.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry
> > > > > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking
> > about
> > > > two
> > > > > releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be
> > > useful
> > > > > to release those as 1.8 release.
> > > > > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces
> > > > > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering
> moving
> > > this
> > > > > work into 2.0 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Alex
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> > >
> > > Talend Community Coder
> > > http://coders.talend.com
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Na Li <li...@cloudera.com>.
+ agree
Lina
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <
kkalyan@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 I agree.
>
> -Kalyan
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 - makes sense.
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <se...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds interesting Sasha.
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there
> are
> > > currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a
> release
> > > for Sentry.
> > >
> > > About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
> > > release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is
> bringing.
> > > The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
> > > (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the
> > > support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more fine-granularity
> > > permissions including column masking and row filtering.
> > >
> > > Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry
> and
> > do
> > > it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
> > >
> > > - Sergio
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <
> akolb@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry
> > > > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking
> about
> > > two
> > > > releases.
> > > >
> > > > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be
> > useful
> > > > to release those as 1.8 release.
> > > > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces
> > > > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving
> > this
> > > > work into 2.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts on this?
> > > >
> > > > - Alex
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda <kk...@cloudera.com>.
+1 I agree.
-Kalyan
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 - makes sense.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <se...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds interesting Sasha.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there are
> > currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a release
> > for Sentry.
> >
> > About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
> > release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is bringing.
> > The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
> > (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the
> > support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more fine-granularity
> > permissions including column masking and row filtering.
> >
> > Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry and
> do
> > it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
> >
> > - Sergio
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <akolb@cloudera.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry
> > > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking about
> > two
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be
> useful
> > > to release those as 1.8 release.
> > > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces
> > > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving
> this
> > > work into 2.0 release.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > - Alex
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
+1 - makes sense.
Colm.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Sergio Pena <se...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Sounds interesting Sasha.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there are
> currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a release
> for Sentry.
>
> About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
> release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is bringing.
> The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
> (probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the
> support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more fine-granularity
> permissions including column masking and row filtering.
>
> Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry and do
> it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
>
> - Sergio
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry
> > release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking about
> two
> > releases.
> >
> > 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be useful
> > to release those as 1.8 release.
> > 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces
> > dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving this
> > work into 2.0 release.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > - Alex
>
--
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Considering Sentry release
Posted by Sergio Pena <se...@cloudera.com>.
Sounds interesting Sasha.
+1 (non-binding)
I took a look at the # of commits between 1.7.0 and master and there are
currently 154 new commits on master. This is good enough to do a release
for Sentry.
About Sentry HA, it makes sense to move this work to a major Sentry
release, such as 2.0 due to incompatibility changes that it is bringing.
The use of Hive notifications logs requires us to support Hive 2.x
(probably next 2.3 release), and it would be interesting to start the
support of Hive Authorization V2 API that brings more fine-granularity
permissions including column masking and row filtering.
Anyway, Hive 2.x and Sentry HA might bring more good stuff to Sentry and do
it on a 2.x release makes more sense.
- Sergio
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Kolbasov <ak...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> I would like to start a preliminary discussion about the new Sentry
> release. To make this interesting, I suggest to consider thinking about two
> releases.
>
> 1) There are a lot of accumulated fixes since 1.7. IMO it would be useful
> to release those as 1.8 release.
> 2) Sentry HA includes a large number of changes plus it introduces
> dependency on newer Hive features, so it is worth considering moving this
> work into 2.0 release.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> - Alex