You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2009/09/03 17:58:14 UTC
Change version of fileinstall to 1.9.0-SNASPHOT (was Re: Packages
exported by fileinstall)
Given the major changes that have occured in fileinstall recently, I wonder
if we should change the version to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT in order to release it as
2.0.0.
Thoughts ?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fileinstall exports the org.osgi.service.cm and org.osgi.service.log
> packages.
> I wonder if this would make more sense to make them optional import and
> make sure the code can run if those are not wired.
> As a side effect would also reduce the size of the jar and simplify the
> resolution process (I don't having having bundles exporting the same package
> really helps ...)
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Change version of fileinstall to 1.9.0-SNASPHOT (was Re: Packages
exported by fileinstall)
Posted by Filippo Diotalevi <fi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the major changes that have occured in fileinstall recently, I wonder
> if we should change the version to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT in order to release it as
> 2.0.0.
>
> Thoughts ?
Definitely agree.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
Re: Change version of fileinstall to 1.9.0-SNASPHOT (was Re: Packages
exported by fileinstall)
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 9/4/09 1:44, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard S. Hall schrieb:
>
>> I have no issue with it.
>>
> Me neither.
>
> On the other hand, I generally keep the snapshot version as it is until
> release, when I decide whether to increase just the minor version or the
> micro version.
>
> Maybe it is a matter of taste ...
>
Yes, I think it is fine to just wait and change the version at the end
too. This is what we do with micro releases for the framework too.
-> richard
> Just my €0.02.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
>> -> richard
>>
>> On 9/3/09 11:58, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> Given the major changes that have occured in fileinstall recently, I
>>> wonder
>>> if we should change the version to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT in order to release
>>> it as
>>> 2.0.0.
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fileinstall exports the org.osgi.service.cm and org.osgi.service.log
>>>> packages.
>>>> I wonder if this would make more sense to make them optional import and
>>>> make sure the code can run if those are not wired.
>>>> As a side effect would also reduce the size of the jar and simplify the
>>>> resolution process (I don't having having bundles exporting the same
>>>> package
>>>> really helps ...)
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Change version of fileinstall to 1.9.0-SNASPHOT (was Re: Packages
exported by fileinstall)
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
> I have no issue with it.
Me neither.
On the other hand, I generally keep the snapshot version as it is until
release, when I decide whether to increase just the minor version or the
micro version.
Maybe it is a matter of taste ...
Just my €0.02.
Regards
Felix
>
> -> richard
>
> On 9/3/09 11:58, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> Given the major changes that have occured in fileinstall recently, I
>> wonder
>> if we should change the version to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT in order to release
>> it as
>> 2.0.0.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Fileinstall exports the org.osgi.service.cm and org.osgi.service.log
>>> packages.
>>> I wonder if this would make more sense to make them optional import and
>>> make sure the code can run if those are not wired.
>>> As a side effect would also reduce the size of the jar and simplify the
>>> resolution process (I don't having having bundles exporting the same
>>> package
>>> really helps ...)
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Change version of fileinstall to 1.9.0-SNASPHOT (was Re: Packages
exported by fileinstall)
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
I have no issue with it.
-> richard
On 9/3/09 11:58, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Given the major changes that have occured in fileinstall recently, I wonder
> if we should change the version to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT in order to release it as
> 2.0.0.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:29, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Fileinstall exports the org.osgi.service.cm and org.osgi.service.log
>> packages.
>> I wonder if this would make more sense to make them optional import and
>> make sure the code can run if those are not wired.
>> As a side effect would also reduce the size of the jar and simplify the
>> resolution process (I don't having having bundles exporting the same package
>> really helps ...)
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>