StateObjectFactory and

[Ca...@usitc.gov]

I was wondering why the tapestry.state.StateObjectContribution does not
support the use of the more feature rich factory services available in
hivemind via the <invoke-factory> element?

Is this to avoid muddling the ASO scope with the service model
associated to a service point.

Carlos

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: StateObjectFactory and

[Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>]

I think the reasoning might be because of how simple / easy it is to
replace StateObjectFactory itself. Perhaps this area could use some
work though. Not sure.

On 11/28/06, Carlos.Fernandez@usitc.gov <Ca...@usitc.gov> wrote:
> I was wondering why the tapestry.state.StateObjectContribution does not
> support the use of the more feature rich factory services available in
> hivemind via the <invoke-factory> element?
>
> Is this to avoid muddling the ASO scope with the service model
> associated to a service point.
>
> Carlos
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org