You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> on 2007/10/28 02:05:35 UTC
Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
sca/tools/wsdl2java
sca/tools/java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on them.
If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Moving wsdl2java to SDO project? was: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com>.
I think wsdl2java tool needs to stay in SCA because it's used to generate SCA service interface which SDO has no knowledge about.
Fuhwei Lwo
Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote: ant elder wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>>
>> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
>> sca/tools/wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>>
>> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
>> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
>> them.
>>
>> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>>
>
>
> Are the wsdl tools even sca specific?
Yes, here's a Java interface generated from WSDL:
package org.apache.tuscany.implementation.bpel.example.helloworld;
import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Remotable;
/*
* HelloPortType java interface
*/
@Remotable
public interface HelloPortType {
/**
* Auto generated method signatures
* @param hello
*/
public java.lang.String hello(
java.lang.String hello) ;
//
}
> wsdl2java doesn't even mention sca at
> all in the pom.xml only sdo, maybe they should be part of the sdo project?
>
I think they should stay in SCA, but I changed the subject to include
SDO to let the SDO folks speak up.
> ...ant
>
>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Moving wsdl2java to SDO project? was: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>>
>> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
>> sca/tools/wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>>
>> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
>> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
>> them.
>>
>> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>>
>
>
> Are the wsdl tools even sca specific?
Yes, here's a Java interface generated from WSDL:
package org.apache.tuscany.implementation.bpel.example.helloworld;
import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Remotable;
/*
* HelloPortType java interface
*/
@Remotable
public interface HelloPortType {
/**
* Auto generated method signatures
* @param hello
*/
public java.lang.String hello(
java.lang.String hello) ;
//
}
> wsdl2java doesn't even mention sca at
> all in the pom.xml only sdo, maybe they should be part of the sdo project?
>
I think they should stay in SCA, but I changed the subject to include
SDO to let the SDO folks speak up.
> ...ant
>
>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>
> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
> them.
>
> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
Are the wsdl tools even sca specific? wsdl2java doesn't even mention sca at
all in the pom.xml only sdo, maybe they should be part of the sdo project?
...ant
Re: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Jean-Sebastien,
Seems a good idea to me...
Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>
> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on them.
>
> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Makes sense to me. +1
- Venkat
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>
> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
> them.
>
> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>