You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> on 2019/06/25 07:42:07 UTC
[DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Sebastian Rühl <se...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
+1 sure go for it
Sebastian
> Am 25.06.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
> For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
>
> We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
>
> I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Chris
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by "Strljic, Matthias Milan" <ma...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de>.
+1 😊
Matthias Strljic, M.Sc.
Universität Stuttgart
Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW)
Seidenstraße 36
70174 Stuttgart
GERMANY
Tel: +49 711 685-84530
Fax: +49 711 685-74530
E-Mail: matthias.strljic@isw.uni-stuttgart.de
Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de
-----Original Message-----
From: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:42 AM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
AW: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Bjoern Hoeper <ho...@ltsoft.de>.
+1 cleaning up is always good
Björn
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Just noticed this was the wrong thread ;-)
Daffodil is now generally history but I didn't delete the protocol modules I haven't migrated yet as I wanted to translate the KNXNet/IP definitions I had created to the new format before deleting the dfdl schemas.
Chris
Am 26.06.19, 08:27 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
Also Done :-)
At first I had moved the java template into the plc4j module, but noticed that we were thinking of making plc4py, plc4cpp and plc4net use their own build systems internally, so keeping the structure would be a challenge, so we'll simply add all templates to the plc4x root build-utils directory.
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 23:15 schrieb "Tim Mitsch" <t....@pragmaticindustries.de>:
Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair.
But also +1 from me
Best
Tim
Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
Oh wow ...
that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away.
Thanks for the ultra-quick responses
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j....@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi,
I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian
Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <so...@isb-fn.de>:
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Also Done :-)
At first I had moved the java template into the plc4j module, but noticed that we were thinking of making plc4py, plc4cpp and plc4net use their own build systems internally, so keeping the structure would be a challenge, so we'll simply add all templates to the plc4x root build-utils directory.
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 23:15 schrieb "Tim Mitsch" <t....@pragmaticindustries.de>:
Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair.
But also +1 from me
Best
Tim
Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
Oh wow ...
that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away.
Thanks for the ultra-quick responses
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j....@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi,
I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian
Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <so...@isb-fn.de>:
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Tim Mitsch <t....@pragmaticindustries.de>.
Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair.
But also +1 from me
Best
Tim
Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:
Oh wow ...
that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away.
Thanks for the ultra-quick responses
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j....@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi,
I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian
Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <so...@isb-fn.de>:
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Oh wow ...
that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away.
Thanks for the ultra-quick responses
Chris
Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j....@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hi,
I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian
Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <so...@isb-fn.de>:
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>.
Hi,
I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian
Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <so...@isb-fn.de>:
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris
AW: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Posted by Markus Sommer <so...@isb-fn.de>.
+1
Freundliche Grüße
Markus Sommer
Geschäftsführer
isb innovative software businesses GmbH
Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2
D - 88046 Friedrichshafen
Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14
Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437
Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20
E-Mail: sommer@isb-fn.de
Web: www.isb-fn.de
Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler
Sitz: Friedrichshafen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624
Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all,
I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox.
For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules.
We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends.
I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them.
What do you think?
Chris