You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@myfaces.apache.org by Apache Wiki <wi...@apache.org> on 2010/01/06 18:54:11 UTC
[Myfaces Wiki] Update of "Extensions/Validator/ValidateAnnotations" by GerhardPetracek
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Myfaces Wiki" for change notification.
The "Extensions/Validator/ValidateAnnotations" page has been changed by GerhardPetracek.
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/Validator/ValidateAnnotations?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5
--------------------------------------------------
== Minimal implementation ==
{{{
- //my.custom.package.CustomRequired
+ //my.custom.package.CustomConstraint
@Target({METHOD, FIELD})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
- public @interface CustomRequired
+ public @interface CustomConstraint
{
}
- //my.custom.package.CustomRequiredValidationStrategy
+ //my.custom.package.CustomConstraintValidationStrategy
- public class CustomRequiredValidationStrategy implements ValidationStrategy
+ public class CustomConstraintValidationStrategy implements ValidationStrategy
{
void validate(FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent uiComponent,
MetaDataEntry metaDataEntry, Object convertedObject)
@@ -39, +39 @@
That's just the simplest case. You can also use one of the other available name conventions or you can provide a custom convention or a custom name mapper or ...
+ '''Hints'''<<BR>>
It's '''recommended to use AbstractValidatorAdapter or AbstractAnnotationValidationStrategy''' instead of ValidationStrategy.
+
+ In ExtVal r3+ validation strategies don't have to be aware of empty/null values. So it's safe to delegate to legacy JSF validators.<<BR>>
+ If a validation strategy should validate such values, it's possible to annotate the validation strategy with NullValueAwareValidationStrategy and/or EmptyValueAwareValidationStrategy.
== Existing annotations ==